Konishi Akihide, Iwasaki Masamichi, Omori Takashi, Shinke Toshiro
Clinical and Translational Research Center, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan.
Heart Vessels. 2020 Nov;35(11):1557-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01626-9. Epub 2020 May 30.
Recent improvements of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) devices and procedures have provided improved outcomes, but it is not clear whether the multiple-inflation BAV technique is effective in patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). We conducted an analysis of the impact of multiple-inflation BAV (at least 6 times inflation) on the mean aortic valve area (AVA) and mean aortic valve pressure gradient (AV-PG) in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis as compared with conventional BAV (from single to three times inflation). We identified two studies of multiple-inflation BAV with antegrade approach using Inoue-balloon catheter (425 patients) and four studies of conventional BAV (170 patients) with retrograde approach. Using a random intercept model, we found that multiple-inflation BAV significantly increased mean AVA (mean difference (MD) [95% indicates confidence interval (CI)] = 0.25 [0.16-0.34], P < 0.001) and significantly decreased mean AV-PG (MD [95% CI] = - 20.2 [- 27.8, - 12.70], P < 0.001) as compared with the conventional BAV. Furthermore, despite an extremely high Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (9.2-14.5), the all-cause mortality rate at one year of multiple-inflation BAV was 16-17%. The results of our analyses indicate that the multiple-inflation BAV technique seem to be effective for patients with symptomatic severe AS as compared with conventional BAV.
球囊主动脉瓣成形术(BAV)设备和操作的近期改进带来了更好的治疗效果,但对于有症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者,多次扩张BAV技术是否有效尚不清楚。我们分析了多次扩张BAV(至少6次扩张)对有症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者平均主动脉瓣面积(AVA)和平均主动脉瓣压力阶差(AV-PG)的影响,并与传统BAV(单次至三次扩张)进行比较。我们确定了两项使用Inoue球囊导管经顺行途径进行多次扩张BAV的研究(425例患者)和四项采用逆行途径的传统BAV研究(170例患者)。使用随机截距模型,我们发现与传统BAV相比,多次扩张BAV显著增加了平均AVA(平均差值(MD)[95%置信区间(CI)]=0.25[0.16 - 0.34],P<0.001),并显著降低了平均AV-PG(MD[95%CI]= - 20.2[-27.8,-12.70],P<0.001)。此外,尽管胸外科医师协会(STS)评分极高(9.2 - 14.5),多次扩张BAV术后一年的全因死亡率仍为16 - 17%。我们的分析结果表明,与传统BAV相比,多次扩张BAV技术对有症状的重度AS患者似乎有效。