• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个颤噪/齿音面板可能会识别出在言语治疗后有功能失调性发声障碍风险的病例。

A panel of jitter/shimmer may identify functional dysphonia at risk of failure after speech therapy.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova, Audiology Unit at Treviso Hospital, Treviso, Italy.

Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova, Audiology Unit at Treviso Hospital, Treviso, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Jul-Aug;41(4):102455. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102455. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102455
PMID:32475619
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are no reliable outcome predictors for functional dysphonia (FD) patients.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if any clinical or phoniatric characteristics could identify FD patients at risk of negative outcome after speech therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the results of 78 FD patients treated with the proprioceptive elastic method. Before and one-month after therapy, patients underwent endoscopy, acoustic analysis with Multi-Dimensional Voice Program, and Voice Handicap Index-10 questionnaire (VHI-10). Negative outcome was the persistence of VHI-10 ≥ 13.

RESULTS

26 FD patients had negative outcome (i.e. VHI-10 ≥ 13) after speech therapy. At univariate analysis, clinical variables (i.e. sex, age, comorbidities, dysphonia duration, and professional voice use) were not associated with the outcome. Elevated Jitter% (Jitt; p = 0.03), Shimmer% (Shim; statistical trend, p = 0.06), and Noise to Harmonics Ratio (statistical trend, p = 0.06) were found in patients with poor results. At multivariate analysis, higher Jitt was an independent negative prognostic factor (p = 0.02), while a statically trend was identified for Shim (p = 0.06). A panel of Jitt >1.5 and Shim >5.1 showed an acceptable discriminatory power (AUC [ROC] = 0.76) according to Hosmer and Lemeshow scale.

CONCLUSION

A panel of two acoustic analysis parameters could help in identifying FD patients at risk of speech therapy failure. Further studies in these patients are needed to evaluate the most efficient treatment protocol.

摘要

背景

目前尚无可靠的方法来预测功能性嗓音障碍(FD)患者的预后。

目的

探讨是否存在某些临床或语音学特征可以识别出在语音治疗后有不良预后风险的 FD 患者。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 78 例接受本体感觉弹性治疗的 FD 患者的治疗结果。在治疗前和治疗后 1 个月,患者接受了喉镜检查、多维度嗓音分析程序(Multi-Dimensional Voice Program)声学分析以及嗓音障碍指数 10 问卷(Voice Handicap Index-10,VHI-10)评估。不良预后定义为治疗后 VHI-10≥13。

结果

26 例 FD 患者在语音治疗后出现不良预后(即 VHI-10≥13)。单因素分析显示,临床变量(如性别、年龄、合并症、嗓音障碍持续时间和职业用嗓)与治疗结果无关。结果不良的患者存在更高的微扰(Jitter%,Jitt;p=0.03)、振幅微扰(Shimmer%,Shim;统计学趋势,p=0.06)和噪声与谐噪比(statistical trend,p=0.06)。多因素分析显示,更高的 Jitt 是独立的不良预后因素(p=0.02),Shim 也有统计学趋势(p=0.06)。Jitt>1.5 和 Shim>5.1 的联合预测能力(根据 Hosmer 和 Lemeshow 量表,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.76)尚可。

结论

联合使用两个声学分析参数可以帮助识别语音治疗失败风险较高的 FD 患者。需要对这些患者进行进一步的研究,以评估最有效的治疗方案。

相似文献

1
A panel of jitter/shimmer may identify functional dysphonia at risk of failure after speech therapy.一个颤噪/齿音面板可能会识别出在言语治疗后有功能失调性发声障碍风险的病例。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Jul-Aug;41(4):102455. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102455. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
2
Correlation of VHI-30 to Acoustic Measurements Across Three Common Voice Disorders.VHI-30与三种常见嗓音障碍声学测量结果的相关性
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
3
Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.无论是否患有嗓音障碍,随着嗓音强度增加,声学微扰指标均有所改善。
J Voice. 2018 Mar;32(2):162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 May 18.
4
Voice Improvement in Patients with Functional Dysphonia Treated with the Proprioceptive-Elastic (PROEL) Method.采用本体感觉弹性(PROEL)方法治疗功能性发声障碍患者的嗓音改善情况。
J Voice. 2018 Mar;32(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
5
Predicting the Outcome of Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis: A Multivariate Discriminating Model Including Grade of Dysphonia, Jitter, Shimmer, and Voice Handicap Index-10.预测单侧声带麻痹的结果:一种多元判别模型,包括发音障碍等级、抖动、闪烁和嗓音障碍指数-10 。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019 May;128(5):447-452. doi: 10.1177/0003489419826597. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
6
Validation of Cepstral Acoustic Analysis for Normal and Pathological Voice in the Japanese Language.基于倒谱分析的日语正常嗓音与病理嗓音的验证。
J Voice. 2022 Nov;36(6):770-776. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
7
Computerized voice therapy in hypofunctional dysphonia.计算机语音治疗在功能性发音障碍中的应用。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Oct;39(5):615-21.
8
Do Standard Instrumental Acoustic, Perceptual, and Subjective Voice Outcomes Indicate Therapy Success in Patients With Functional Dysphonia?标准仪器声学、感知和主观语音结果是否能表明功能性发音障碍患者的治疗成功?
J Voice. 2019 May;33(3):317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.11.014. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Voice in Friedreich Ataxia.弗里德赖希共济失调中的语音问题
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):243.e9-243.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
10
Multidimensional Assessment of the Effectiveness of Group Voice Therapy.团体语音治疗效果的多维评估
J Voice. 2017 Nov;31(6):714-721. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensitivity of Acoustic Voice Quality Measures in Simulated Reverberation Conditions.模拟混响条件下声学语音质量测量的敏感性
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;11(12):1253. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11121253.