Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, 25809The University of Hong Kong, China.
Surg Innov. 2020 Oct;27(5):431-438. doi: 10.1177/1553350620925321. Epub 2020 May 30.
. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) are commonly used for assessing pancreatic lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in a single tertiary institution. . Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of the pancreas at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, from January 2015 to March 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Endoscopic findings and FNA results were analysed. For patients who subsequently underwent surgical resection of pancreatic lesion, EUS-FNA diagnoses were compared to histopathological findings of surgical specimens to determine its diagnostic accuracy. . One hundred twelve EUS-FNA were performed in 99 patients within the study time period and were included for analysis. Sixty-six (66.7%) pancreatic lesions were solid in nature and 33 (33.3%) were cystic. The overall diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA was 70.5% (n = 79). On multivariate analysis, more passes of needle were associated with a higher diagnostic yield (odds ratio = 2.000, = .049). 57.1% (n = 64) of EUS-FNA results had an impact on management. Sixteen patients with diagnostic EUS-FNA subsequently underwent surgery for resection of the pancreatic lesion. Upon correlation to the histopathological findings of surgical specimens, there were 12 true-positive, 2 true-negative, 0 false-positive, and 2 false-negative cases. Sensitivity was 85.7%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, and negative predictive value was 50%. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA was 87.5%. . EUS-FNA is accurate and reliable for diagnosing pancreatic lesions.
内镜超声(EUS)和细针抽吸(FNA)常用于评估胰腺病变。本研究旨在评估香港玛丽医院单中心内镜超声引导下细针抽吸(EUS-FNA)的诊断效果和准确率。
回顾性分析 2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 3 月在香港玛丽医院行 EUS-FNA 的连续患者。分析内镜所见和 FNA 结果。对于随后行胰腺病变切除术的患者,将 EUS-FNA 诊断与手术标本的组织病理学结果进行比较,以确定其诊断准确性。
在研究期间,共有 99 例患者进行了 112 次 EUS-FNA 检查,纳入分析。66 例(66.7%)胰腺病变为实性,33 例(33.3%)为囊性。EUS-FNA 的总体诊断效果为 70.5%(n=79)。多变量分析显示,更多的针道与更高的诊断效果相关(优势比=2.000,p=0.049)。57.1%(n=64)的 EUS-FNA 结果对治疗有影响。16 例诊断性 EUS-FNA 患者随后因胰腺病变行切除术。与手术标本的组织病理学结果相比较,12 例为真阳性,2 例为真阴性,0 例为假阳性,2 例为假阴性。敏感性为 85.7%,特异性为 100%,阳性预测值为 100%,阴性预测值为 50%。EUS-FNA 的诊断准确率为 87.5%。
EUS-FNA 对胰腺病变的诊断准确可靠。