Garfinkel Megan B, Minor Emily S, Whelan Christopher J
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Institute for Environmental Science and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Condor. 2020 May 5;122(2):duaa009. doi: 10.1093/condor/duaa009. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
Birds provide ecosystem services (pest control) in many agroecosystems and have neutral or negative ecological effects (disservices) in others. Large-scale, conventional row crop agriculture is extremely widespread globally, yet few studies of bird effects take place in these agroecosystems. We studied indirect effects of insectivorous birds on corn and soybean crops in fields adjacent to a prairie in Illinois (USA). We hypothesized that prairie birds would forage for arthropods in adjacent crop fields and that the magnitude of services or disservices would decrease with distance from the prairie. We used bird-excluding cages over crops to examine the net effect of birds on corn and soybean grain yield. We also conducted DNA metabarcoding to identify arthropod prey in fecal samples from captured birds. Our exclosure experiments revealed that birds provided net services in corn and net disservices in soybeans. Distance from prairie was not a significant predictor of exclosure treatment effect in either crop. Many bird fecal samples contained DNA from both beneficial arthropods and known economically significant pests of corn, but few economically significant pests of soybeans. Song Sparrows (), one of our most captured species, most commonly consumed corn rootworms, an economically significant pest of corn crops. We estimated that birds in this system provided a service worth approximately US $275 ha in corn yield gain, and a disservice valued at approximately $348 ha in soybean yield loss. Our study is the first to demonstrate that birds can provide substantial and economically valuable services in field corn, and disservices in soybean crops. The contrasting findings in the 2 crop systems suggest a range of bird impacts within widespread agroecosystems and demonstrate the importance of quantifying net trophic effects.
鸟类在许多农业生态系统中提供生态系统服务(害虫控制),而在其他一些系统中则具有中性或负面的生态影响(生态系统负服务)。大规模的传统行栽作物农业在全球极为普遍,但在这些农业生态系统中,很少有关于鸟类影响的研究。我们在美国伊利诺伊州一片草原附近的田地里,研究了食虫鸟类对玉米和大豆作物的间接影响。我们假设草原鸟类会在相邻的农田中捕食节肢动物,并且生态系统服务或负服务的程度会随着与草原距离的增加而降低。我们在作物上方使用了防鸟笼,以研究鸟类对玉米和大豆籽粒产量的净影响。我们还进行了DNA宏条形码分析,以识别捕获鸟类粪便样本中的节肢动物猎物。我们的排除实验表明,鸟类对玉米提供了净服务,而对大豆则造成了净负服务。在这两种作物中,与草原的距离都不是排除处理效果的显著预测因子。许多鸟类粪便样本中既含有有益节肢动物的DNA,也含有已知的对玉米具有经济重要性的害虫的DNA,但含有对大豆具有经济重要性的害虫的DNA的样本很少。歌带鹀(我们捕获最多的物种之一)最常捕食玉米根虫,这是一种对玉米作物具有经济重要性的害虫。我们估计,该系统中的鸟类为玉米产量增加提供了价值约275美元/公顷的服务,而对大豆产量损失造成了价值约348美元/公顷的负服务。我们的研究首次证明,鸟类可以在田间玉米中提供实质性的、具有经济价值的服务,而在大豆作物中则造成负服务。这两种作物系统中的对比结果表明,在广泛的农业生态系统中,鸟类的影响范围很广,并证明了量化净营养效应的重要性。