Weinstock Leonard B, Myers Trisha L, Shetty Anup
Dept. Anesthesia and Internal Medicine, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Specialist in Gastroenterology, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2017;34(2):184-187. doi: 10.36141/svdld.v34i2.5303. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
Systemic therapy is administered to 50% of patients and the need for long-term use of therapy is quite variable (1,2). Prednisone is often administered for many months with risk for multiple side effects, immunomodulators as steroid sparing agents have a delayed onset of action and have risks for infection and malignancies, and infliximab increases the risk for infection (1). In light of these issues, alternative options for therapy are desirable. We made a comparison between sarcoidosis and Crohn's disease in that in each disease there is unregulated lymphocyte activity, a common unique pathological finding of non-caseating granulomas, and a similar approach to medical therapy (3,4). Low dose naltrexone (LDN) has been utilized for many conditions (5). Efficacy has been documented in Crohn's disease with randomized controlled studies showing mucosal healing and histologic improvement (6-7). LDN is compounded in 1/10 to 1/20 the dose used for the FDA-approved indications of narcotic and alcohol dependence (8). Neuropeptides (e.g., enkephalins and endorphins) are present in the gastrointestinal tract and endocrine cells and modulate immune responses (9). Up-regulation of met-enkephelin and opioid receptors can be induced by a rebound effect by short-acting LDN (10). Higher levels of endogenous opioids and receptors inhibit cell proliferation which suppress T and B lymphocyte responses (11,12) and decrease production of pro-inflammatory interleukins-6 and -12 (13). In light of the Crohn's disease LDN literature and similar experiences with other inflammatory conditions in our clinic (14,15), LDN was administered to a sarcoidosis patient with severe fatigue, sarcoid rash, and marked radiographic evidence of gastrointestinal involvement. .
50%的患者接受全身治疗,且长期治疗的需求差异很大(1,2)。泼尼松通常要服用数月,存在多种副作用风险;作为类固醇节约剂的免疫调节剂起效延迟,有感染和恶性肿瘤风险;英夫利昔单抗会增加感染风险(1)。鉴于这些问题,需要其他治疗选择。我们对结节病和克罗恩病进行了比较,因为在每种疾病中都存在淋巴细胞活动不受调节、非干酪样肉芽肿这一共同独特病理表现以及相似的药物治疗方法(3,4)。低剂量纳曲酮(LDN)已用于多种病症(5)。随机对照研究表明其在克罗恩病中有疗效,可实现黏膜愈合和组织学改善(6 - 7)。LDN的配方剂量是用于美国食品药品监督管理局批准的麻醉和酒精依赖适应症剂量的1/10至1/20(8)。神经肽(如脑啡肽和内啡肽)存在于胃肠道和内分泌细胞中,调节免疫反应(9)。短效LDN的反弹效应可诱导甲硫氨酸脑啡肽和阿片受体上调(10)。内源性阿片类物质和受体水平升高会抑制细胞增殖,从而抑制T和B淋巴细胞反应(11,12),并减少促炎白细胞介素-6和-12的产生(13)。鉴于克罗恩病LDN的文献以及我们诊所对其他炎症性疾病的类似经验(14,15),我们对一名患有严重疲劳、结节性皮疹且有明显胃肠道受累影像学证据的结节病患者使用了LDN。