Suppr超能文献

方解石(10.4)、文石(011)Ca和球霰石(010)CO表面上CH和CO吸附的比较:分子动力学和密度泛函理论研究

Comparison of CH and CO Adsorptions onto Calcite(10.4), Aragonite(011)Ca, and Vaterite(010)CO Surfaces: An MD and DFT Investigation.

作者信息

Zhang Ming, Li Jian, Zhao Junyu, Cui Youming, Luo Xian

机构信息

School of Petroleum Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China.

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China.

出版信息

ACS Omega. 2020 May 11;5(20):11369-11377. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00345. eCollection 2020 May 26.

Abstract

The interaction between greenhouse gases (such as CH and CO) and carbonate rocks has a significant impact on carbon transfer among different geochemical reservoirs. Moreover, CH and CO gases usually associate with oil and natural gas reserves, and their adsorption onto sedimentary rocks may influence the exploitation of fossil fuels. By employing the molecular dynamics (MD) and density functional theory (DFT) methods, the adsorptions of CH and CO onto three different CaCO polymorphs (i.e., calcite(10.4), aragonite(011)Ca, and vaterite(010)CO) are compared in the present work. The calculated adsorption energies ( ) are always negative for the three substrates, which indicates that their adsorptions are exothermic processes and spontaneous in thermodynamics. The of CO is much more negative, which suggests that the CO adsorption will form stronger interfacial binding compared with the CH adsorption. The adsorption precedence of CH on the three surfaces is aragonite(011)Ca > vaterite(010)CO > calcite(10.4), while for CO, the sequence is vaterite(010)CO > aragonite(011)Ca > calcite(10.4). Combining with the interfacial atomic configuration analysis, the Mulliken atomic charge distribution and overlap bond population are discussed. The results demonstrate that the adsorption of CH is physisorption and that its interfacial interaction mainly comes from the electrostatic effects between H in CH and O in CO , while the CO adsorption is chemisorption and the interfacial binding effect is mainly contributed by the bonds between O in CO and Ca and the electrostatic interaction between C in CO and O in CO .

摘要

温室气体(如CH和CO)与碳酸盐岩之间的相互作用对不同地球化学储库间的碳转移具有重大影响。此外,CH和CO气体通常与石油和天然气储量相关联,它们在沉积岩上的吸附可能会影响化石燃料的开采。在本研究中,通过运用分子动力学(MD)和密度泛函理论(DFT)方法,比较了CH和CO在三种不同的CaCO多晶型物(即方解石(10.4)、文石(011)Ca和球霰石(010)CO)上的吸附情况。对于这三种底物,计算得到的吸附能( )始终为负,这表明它们的吸附是放热过程,在热力学上是自发的。CO的吸附能更负,这表明与CH吸附相比,CO吸附会形成更强的界面结合。CH在三个表面上的吸附优先顺序为文石(011)Ca > 球霰石(010)CO > 方解石(10.4),而对于CO,顺序为球霰石(010)CO > 文石(011)Ca > 方解石(10.4)。结合界面原子构型分析,讨论了 Mulliken 原子电荷分布和重叠键布居。结果表明,CH的吸附是物理吸附,其界面相互作用主要来自CH中的H与CO 中的O之间的静电作用,而CO的吸附是化学吸附,界面结合作用主要由CO中的O与Ca之间的键以及CO中的C与CO中的O之间的静电相互作用贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab67/7254519/569dda632f7a/ao0c00345_0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验