Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Age Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;49(6):1048-1055. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa087.
to evaluate the effect of an integrated care model for pre-frail and frail community-dwelling older people.
a quasi-experimental design.
we enrolled people aged ≥60 years from a community care project. An inclusion criterion was pre-frailty/frailty, as measured by a simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) with a score of ≥1.
we assigned participants to an intervention group (n = 183) in which they received an integrated intervention (in-depth assessment, personalised care plans and coordinated care) or a control group (n = 270) in which they received a group education session on frailty prevention. The outcomes were changes in frailty, individual domains of frailty ('fatigue', 'resistance', 'ambulation', 'illnesses' and 'loss of weight') and health services utilisation over 12 months. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up.
the mean age of the participants (n = 453) at baseline was 76.1 ± 7.5 years, and 363 (80.1%) were women. At follow-up, the intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in FRAIL scores than the control group (P < 0.033). In addition, 22.4% of the intervention and 13.7% of the control participants had reverted from pre-frail/frail to robust status, with the difference reaching significance when the intervention was compared with the control group (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.4) after adjustments for age, sex, living arrangement/marital status and hypercholesterolemia. For individual domains of frailty, the adjusted OR for improved 'resistance' was 1.7 (95% CI 1.0-2.8). However, no effects were found on reducing use of health services.
the integrated health and social care model reduced FRAIL scores in a combined population of pre-frail/frail community-dwelling older people attending older people's centres.
评估针对社区居住的虚弱前期和虚弱老年人的综合护理模式的效果。
准实验设计。
我们从社区护理项目中招募了年龄≥60 岁的人。纳入标准是通过简单的虚弱问卷(FRAIL)评分≥1 分,测量为虚弱前期/虚弱。
我们将参与者分配到干预组(n=183),他们接受综合干预(深入评估、个性化护理计划和协调护理)或对照组(n=270),他们接受虚弱预防的团体教育课程。12 个月的虚弱变化、虚弱的个体领域(“疲劳”、“抵抗力”、“活动能力”、“疾病”和“体重减轻”)和卫生服务利用情况是主要结局。评估在基线和 12 个月的随访时进行。
参与者(n=453)的平均年龄为 76.1±7.5 岁,其中 363 人(80.1%)为女性。在随访时,干预组的 FRAIL 评分降低明显大于对照组(P<0.033)。此外,干预组 22.4%的参与者从虚弱前期/虚弱状态恢复为健康状态,而对照组为 13.7%,在调整年龄、性别、居住安排/婚姻状况和高胆固醇血症后,干预组与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(比值比[OR]1.6,95%置信区间[CI]1.0-2.4)。对于虚弱的个体领域,“抵抗力”改善的调整 OR 为 1.7(95%CI 1.0-2.8)。然而,在减少卫生服务的使用方面没有效果。
综合卫生和社会保健模式降低了参加老年人中心的虚弱前期/虚弱的社区居住老年人的 FRAIL 评分。