VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Aug;33(4):600-602. doi: 10.1002/jts.22514. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
Zalta and Held (2020) generated some interesting and potentially useful principles to distinguish moral distress and moral injury, leveraging ideas from our introduction to the Journal of Traumatic Stress special issue on moral injury. In this response, I provide feedback and commentary about the principles generated by Zalta and Held. I also attempt to modify and expand the various principles to accommodate any moral emotion and all possible dimensions of response to exposure to potentially morally injurious experiences.
Zalta 和 Held（2020）提出了一些有趣且可能有用的原则，用以区分道德困境和道德伤害，这些原则借鉴了我们对《创伤应激杂志》关于道德伤害特刊的介绍。在本回应中，我对 Zalta 和 Held 提出的原则提供了反馈和评论。我还试图修改和扩展这些原则，以涵盖任何道德情感和对可能有道德伤害的经历的所有可能的反应维度。
