Suppr超能文献

药物治疗与孤立性钝性椎动脉损伤患者的卒中预防无关。

Pharmacologic Therapy is Not Associated with Stroke Prevention in Patients with Isolated Blunt Vertebral Artery Injury.

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;70:137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.05.029. Epub 2020 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vertebral artery injury (VAI) is often grouped with carotid artery injury into a broader classification of blunt cerebrovascular injury, despite fundamental differences in mechanism of injury and outcome. This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of medical therapy in preventing strokes for isolated VAI.

METHODS

Patients with isolated blunt VAI (2011-2018) were identified from the trauma registry of a level I trauma center. A retrospective chart review was conducted excluding patients with concomitant carotid artery injury. Factors examined included demographics, injury characteristics, anatomic classification, and management strategy. Patients were stratified by whether they received pharmacological (antiplatelet or anticoagulation) therapy. The primary outcome was new posterior circulation stroke within 30 days of injury as confirmed by imaging studies.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients with blunt VAI were included. Median Injury Severity Score was 17 and 33 (16.0%) patients presented with Glasgow Coma Scale <8. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (58.7%). The injuries were bilateral in 38 (18.5%) patients and 73 (35.4%) suffered multisegmental injuries. The anatomic severity of injuries was Grade 1 = 38.8%, Grade 2 = 25.7%, Grade 3 = 4.9%, Grade 4 = 30.6%, and Grade 5 = 0.5%. There was no correlation between anatomic grade and stroke (P = 0.11) or initiation of pharmacologic therapy (P = 0.30). In total, 172 (84%) patients received pharmacological therapy with no differences in baseline characteristics between treated and untreated patients. Overall, the 30-day stroke rate was 1.9%. There was no difference in stroke rate between patients who received medical therapy versus those who did not (5.9% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.13). In subgroup analysis by injury severity, medical therapy did not improve stroke rates. Among patients treated with aspirin, there was no difference in stroke rate between doses of 81 vs. 325 mg (1.1% vs. 0%, P = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated VAI is associated with a very low risk of stroke and treatment with medical therapies including antiplatelet or anticoagulation does not improve risk of stroke.

摘要

背景

椎动脉损伤(VAI)通常与颈动脉损伤一起归入更广泛的钝性脑血管损伤分类,尽管损伤机制和结果存在根本差异。本研究旨在评估药物治疗预防孤立性 VAI 卒中的效果。

方法

从一级创伤中心的创伤登记处确定了 2011 年至 2018 年期间患有孤立性钝性 VAI 的患者。回顾性图表审查排除了同时患有颈动脉损伤的患者。检查的因素包括人口统计学、损伤特征、解剖分类和管理策略。根据是否接受药物治疗(抗血小板或抗凝)对患者进行分层。主要结局是受伤后 30 天内新的后循环卒中,通过影像学研究证实。

结果

共纳入 206 例 VAI 患者。中位损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为 17 分,33 例(16.0%)患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)<8。最常见的损伤机制是机动车碰撞(58.7%)。38 例(18.5%)患者的损伤为双侧,73 例(35.4%)患者有多处节段损伤。损伤的解剖严重程度为 1 级=38.8%,2 级=25.7%,3 级=4.9%,4 级=30.6%,5 级=0.5%。解剖学分级与卒中之间无相关性(P=0.11)或与药物治疗的开始无关(P=0.30)。总共 172 例(84%)患者接受了药物治疗,治疗组和未治疗组患者的基线特征无差异。总的来说,30 天内卒中发生率为 1.9%。接受药物治疗的患者与未接受药物治疗的患者卒中发生率无差异(5.9%比 1.2%,P=0.13)。根据损伤严重程度的亚组分析,药物治疗并不能降低卒中发生率。在接受阿司匹林治疗的患者中,81mg 和 325mg 剂量的卒中发生率无差异(1.1%比 0%,P=1)。

结论

孤立性 VAI 卒中风险非常低,使用包括抗血小板或抗凝在内的药物治疗并不能降低卒中风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验