Conquest of COVID-19. Publish it to death?
作者信息
Gale Robert P
机构信息
Imperial College London, London, UK.
出版信息
Br J Haematol. 2020 Aug;190(3):358-360. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16905. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Conquest of COVID-19. Publish it to death?战胜新冠疫情。将其公之于众以消灭它？
Br J Haematol. 2020 Aug;190(3):358-360. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16905. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
COVID-19 and Biomedical Publishing: Challenges and Prospects.新冠疫情与生物医学出版：挑战与前景
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Oct;30(10):92-93. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.supp2.92.
3
The first 10 000 COVID-19 papers in perspective: are we publishing what we should be publishing?透视首批10000篇新冠病毒肺炎相关论文：我们发表的是我们应该发表的内容吗？
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Oct 1;30(5):849-850. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa170.
4
[Gaceta Sanitaria's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid management and transfer].[《卫生公报》对新冠疫情的应对：快速管理与转移]
Gac Sanit. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):425-427. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.07.001.
5
Journal of Optometry in Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) and peer-review process during COVID-19 pandemic.《新兴资源引文索引（ESCI）中的验光杂志》及新冠疫情期间的同行评审过程
J Optom. 2020 Oct-Dec;13(4):213-215. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.06.003.
6
Has Covid-19 Gone Viral? An Overview of Research by Subject Area.Covid-19 是否已经失控？各研究领域综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Dec;47(6):861-869. doi: 10.1177/1090198120958368. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
7
Research in the context of coronavirus disease 2019: Considerations for critical care environments.2019冠状病毒病背景下的研究：重症监护环境的考量
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Jul;33(4):309-310. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.06.004.
8
The Landscape of Medical Literature in the Era of COVID-19: Original Research Versus Opinion Pieces.新冠疫情时代的医学文献格局：原创研究与观点文章
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2813-2815. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06021-8. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
9
A special thank you to our authors for their responses to the coronavirus disease pandemic.特别感谢我们的作者对冠状病毒病大流行所做出的回应。
CJEM. 2020 Jul;22(4):399. doi: 10.1017/cem.2020.407.
10
The JCF in the Time of COVID-19.新冠疫情时期的日本临床肿瘤学会（JCF）
J Card Fail. 2020 Jun;26(6):447. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.06.004.
引用本文的文献
1
Transformative learning of medical trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study.COVID-19 大流行期间医学实习生的变革性学习：混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 16;17(9):e0274683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274683. eCollection 2022.
2
COVID 19 Scoping: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.新型冠状病毒肺炎的范围界定：一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S938-S942. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_387_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Literature on the Early Phase of COVID-19 in Italy.一项针对意大利 COVID-19 早期阶段的科学文献的系统评价和文献计量分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;9:666669. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.666669. eCollection 2021.
4
COVID-19 meta-analyses: a scoping review and quality assessment.COVID-19 荟萃分析：范围综述和质量评估。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2021 Mar 15;19:eAO6002. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6002. eCollection 2021.
5
Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Single-Center Experience and Case-Control Study.新型冠状病毒肺炎在肾移植受者中的临床特征：单中心经验和病例对照研究。
Transplant Proc. 2021 May;53(4):1187-1193. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
Compassionate use of JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib for severe COVID-19: a prospective observational study.JAK1/2 抑制剂芦可替尼治疗重症 COVID-19 的同情使用：一项前瞻性观察研究。
Leukemia. 2021 Apr;35(4):1121-1133. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-01018-y. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
本文引用的文献
1
Special considerations in the management of adult patients with acute leukaemias and myeloid neoplasms in the COVID-19 era: recommendations from a panel of international experts.2019冠状病毒病（COVID-19）时代成人急性白血病和髓系肿瘤患者管理的特殊考量：国际专家小组的建议
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Aug;7(8):e601-e612. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30205-2. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
Waste in covid-19 research.新冠疫情研究中的浪费现象。
BMJ. 2020 May 12;369:m1847. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1847.
3
COVID-19, HCT and wine.新型冠状病毒肺炎、造血干细胞移植与葡萄酒。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Aug;55(8):1521-1522. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0932-3. Epub 2020 May 6.
4
Annals Clinical Decision Making: Weighing Evidence to Inform Clinical Decisions.《临床决策年鉴：权衡证据以指导临床决策》
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 5;172(9):599-603. doi: 10.7326/M19-1941. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
Working 9 to 5, not the way to make an academic living: observational analysis of manuscript and peer review submissions over time.朝九晚五工作，无法维持学术生计：对投稿和同行评审随时间变化的观察性分析。
BMJ. 2019 Dec 19;367:l6460. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6460.
6
Causal inference in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中的因果推断。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jan;55(1):4-8. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0424-x. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
7
Is there expert consensus on expert consensus?对于专家共识，是否存在专家共识？
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Aug;53(8):1055-1060. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0128-2. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
8
Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful.为何大多数临床研究并无用处。
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 21;13(6):e1002049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049. eCollection 2016 Jun.
9
Quality and strength of evidence of the Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guidelines.美国传染病学会临床实践指南的质量和证据强度。
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Nov 15;51(10):1147-56. doi: 10.1086/656735. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
10
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?什么是“证据质量”，它对临床医生为何重要？
BMJ. 2008 May 3;336(7651):995-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE.
Zotero 插件