Deitelzweig Steve, Keshishian Allison, Kang Amiee, Dhamane Amol D, Luo Xuemei, Li Xiaoyan, Balachander Neeraja, Rosenblatt Lisa, Mardekian Jack, Pan Xianying, Fusco Manuela Di, Garcia Reeves Alessandra B, Yuce Huseyin, Lip Gregory Y H
Ochsner Clinic Foundation, Department of Hospital Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70115, USA.
The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA.
J Clin Med. 2020 May 28;9(6):1633. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061633.
This ARISTOPHANES analysis examined stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among a subgroup of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with obesity prescribed warfarin or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in order to inform clinical decision making. A retrospective observational study was conducted among NVAF patients who were obese and initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from 1 January 2013-30 September 2015, with data pooled from CMS Medicare and four US commercial claims databases. Propensity score matching was completed between NOACs and against warfarin in each database, and the results were pooled. Cox models were used to evaluate the risks of stroke/SE and MB. A total of 88,461 patients with obesity were included in the study. Apixaban and rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE vs. warfarin (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.82 and HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98). Dabigatran was associated with a similar risk of stroke/SE compared to warfarin. Compared with warfarin, apixaban and dabigatran had a lower risk of MB (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.49-0.61 and HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.91). Rivaroxaban was associated with a similar risk of MB compared to warfarin. In this high-risk population with obesity, NOACs had a varying risk of stroke/SE and MB vs. warfarin.
这项阿里斯托芬分析研究了在开具华法林或非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)的肥胖非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者亚组中,中风/全身性栓塞(SE)和大出血(MB)情况,以便为临床决策提供依据。对2013年1月1日至2015年9月30日期间开始使用阿哌沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班或华法林的肥胖NVAF患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究,数据来自医疗保险和四个美国商业索赔数据库。在每个数据库中对NOACs与华法林进行倾向得分匹配,并汇总结果。使用Cox模型评估中风/SE和MB的风险。该研究共纳入88461名肥胖患者。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班和利伐沙班与较低的中风/SE风险相关(风险比:0.63,95%置信区间:0.49 - 0.82;风险比:0.84,95%置信区间:0.72 - 0.98)。达比加群与华法林相比,中风/SE风险相似。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班和达比加群大出血风险较低(风险比:0.54,95%置信区间:0.49 - 0.61;风险比:0.75,95%置信区间:0.63 - 0.91)。利伐沙班与华法林相比,大出血风险相似。在这个肥胖的高风险人群中,与华法林相比,NOACs的中风/SE和MB风险各不相同。