• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表皮葡萄球菌眼内炎的基因型和表型抗生素耐药性

Genotypic and Phenotypic Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus Epidermidis Endophthalmitis.

作者信息

Laura Diana M, Scott Nathan L, Vanner Elizabeth A, Miller Darlene, Flynn Harry W

出版信息

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020 May 1;51(5):S13-S16. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20200108-02.

DOI:10.3928/23258160-20200108-02
PMID:32484896
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate antibiotic resistance patterns in Staphylococcus epidermis endophthalmitis isolates, identify antibiotic resistance genes, and compare this to their phenotypic resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective case series of S. epidermidis isolates from January 2012 to December 2017. Phenotypic resistance was determined from minimum inhibitory concentration values. Genotypic resistance was determined from DNA microarray. The relationship between these was analyzed using Cohen's kappa and predictive value.

RESULTS

Seventy-five isolates were included. More than 60% were resistant to methicillin and erythromycin. Approximately 60% possessed the resistance genes for methicillin and erythromycin, and 25% for clindamycin. There was near perfect agreement between genotype and phenotype for erythromycin and methicillin (kappa = 0.88 and 0.89, respectively). Approximately 98% (P < 0.0001) of isolates with erythromycin and methicillin resistance genes and 90% (P = 0.0006) with clindamycin resistance genes were phenotypically resistant to those antibiotics. None were resistant to vancomycin.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between genotypic and phenotypic antibiotic resistance highlights that resistance may be polygenic, and genes may be silent. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:S13-S16.].

摘要

背景与目的

评估表皮葡萄球菌眼内炎分离株的抗生素耐药模式,鉴定抗生素耐药基因,并将其与表型耐药性进行比较。

材料与方法

回顾性病例系列研究,纳入2012年1月至2017年12月的表皮葡萄球菌分离株。根据最低抑菌浓度值确定表型耐药性。通过DNA微阵列确定基因型耐药性。使用科恩kappa系数和预测值分析两者之间的关系。

结果

共纳入75株分离株。超过60%对甲氧西林和红霉素耐药。约60%携带甲氧西林和红霉素耐药基因,25%携带克林霉素耐药基因。红霉素和甲氧西林的基因型与表型之间几乎完全一致(kappa系数分别为0.88和0.89)。携带红霉素和甲氧西林耐药基因的分离株中约98%(P < 0.0001)以及携带克林霉素耐药基因的分离株中约90%(P = 0.0006)对这些抗生素表型耐药。无一株对万古霉素耐药。

结论

基因型与表型抗生素耐药性之间的关系表明,耐药可能是多基因的,且基因可能是沉默的。[《眼科手术、激光与视网膜成像》。2020;51:S13 - S16。]

相似文献

1
Genotypic and Phenotypic Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus Epidermidis Endophthalmitis.表皮葡萄球菌眼内炎的基因型和表型抗生素耐药性
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020 May 1;51(5):S13-S16. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20200108-02.
2
Endophthalmitis caused by staphylococcus epidermidis: in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities and clinical outcomes.表皮葡萄球菌引起的眼内炎:体外抗生素敏感性及临床结果
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2007 Nov-Dec;38(6):446-51. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20071101-01.
3
Genetic and Phenotypic Traits of Staphylococcus Epidermidis Strains Causing Postcataract Endophthalmitis Compared to Commensal Conjunctival Flora.表皮葡萄球菌致白内障术后眼内炎菌株的遗传和表型特征与结膜共生菌群比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;191:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.042. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
4
Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis: antibiotic susceptibilities, methicillin resistance, and clinical outcomes.金黄色葡萄球菌眼内炎:抗生素敏感性、耐甲氧西林和临床结局。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;149(2):278-283.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.023. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
5
In vitro efficacy and pharmacodynamic indices for antibiotics against coagulase-negative staphylococcus endophthalmitis isolates.抗生素针对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌眼内炎分离株的体外疗效及药效学指标。
Ophthalmology. 2007 May;114(5):871-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.007. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
6
Clinical outcomes and antibiotic susceptibilities of Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis.金黄色葡萄球菌性眼内炎的临床结局及抗生素敏感性
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;255(4):651-656. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3504-x. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
7
The efficacy of intravitreal piperacillin/tazobactam in rabbits with experimental Staphylococcus epidermidis endophthalmitis: a comparison with vancomycin.玻璃体内注射哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗实验性表皮葡萄球菌性眼内炎家兔的疗效:与万古霉素的比较
Ophthalmic Res. 2005 May-Jun;37(3):168-74. doi: 10.1159/000086074. Epub 2005 May 12.
8
Coagulase-negative staphylococcal endophthalmitis. Increase in antimicrobial resistance.凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌性眼内炎。抗菌药物耐药性增加。
Ophthalmology. 1988 Oct;95(10):1404-10. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)32990-8.
9
Staphylococcus epidermidis endophthalmitis following strabismus surgery.斜视手术后发生的表皮葡萄球菌眼内炎。
J AAPOS. 2004 Dec;8(6):592-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.08.006.
10
Endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: the sucking corneal wound.白内障手术后的眼内炎:抽吸性角膜伤口。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1643-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.013.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of oxygen content on pathogenesis in ocular infection based on clinical characteristics, transcriptome and metabolome analysis.基于临床特征、转录组和代谢组分析探讨氧含量对眼部感染发病机制的影响
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1409597. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1409597. eCollection 2024.
2
spp. Causatives of Infections and Carrier of , , and Genes Associated with Resistance.感染病原体以及携带与耐药相关的、、和基因。 (注:原文中“spp.”“ ,,”部分内容不完整准确,翻译可能会受一定影响,整体译文仅供参考)
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 29;12(4):671. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040671.
3
Microbial Landscape and Antibiotic Susceptibility Dynamics of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Kazakhstan 2018-2020.
2018 - 2020年哈萨克斯坦皮肤和软组织感染的微生物格局及抗生素敏感性动态
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 13;11(5):659. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050659.
4
Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Shiga Toxin-Producing (STEC) and Enteropathogenic (EPEC) from Imported Foods in China during 2015-2021.2015-2021 年中国进口食品中产志贺毒素(STEC)和肠致病性(EPEC)的流行情况、耐药性及全基因组测序分析。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;14(2):68. doi: 10.3390/toxins14020068.
5
Aging, But Not Sex and Genetic Diversity, Impacts the Pathobiology of Bacterial Endophthalmitis.衰老而非性别和遗传多样性影响细菌性眼内炎的发病机制。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Dec 1;61(14):5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.14.5.