• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤至乳头距离不应排除乳腺癌患者行保乳头乳房切除术。个人经验与文献回顾。

Tumor-to-nipple Distance Should Not Preclude Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients. Personal Experience and Literature Review.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2020 Jun;40(6):3543-3550. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14343.

DOI:10.21873/anticanres.14343
PMID:32487656
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: A retrospective study was performed in 246 breast cancer patients to define whether tumor-to-nipple distance (TND) assessment by breast MRI may select patients eligible to nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) as compared to permanent section assessment of retroareolar margin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pre- and post-operative parameters including imaging data, histology of the primary tumor, biologic prognostic factors, and adjuvant regimens were retrieved; patients with close/positive retroareolar margins underwent nipple or NAC excision. The primary endpoint was loco-regional recurrence (LRR).

RESULTS

Patients with TND ≤2 cm had a significantly higher rate of invasive ductal carcinoma (p<0.003) and excision margins less than 2 mm (p<0.000). Eleven retroareolar specimens were positive at definitive pathology; final re-excision specimen examination showed residual disease in seven patients (63.6%). At a median follow-up of 31 to 33 months, no NAC recurrence did occur; disease-free survival was more than 96%, and LRR was homogeneously distributed among TND subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic NSM is a safe procedure independently of TND assessed at preoperative breast MRI. Permanent section assessment of retroareolar tissue is more accurate and cost-effective than frozen section. Furthermore, delayed nipple and/or NAC excision did not impair local disease control.

摘要

背景/目的:本回顾性研究纳入了 246 例乳腺癌患者,旨在评估乳腺 MRI 测量的肿瘤至乳头距离(TND)是否可选择适合保乳乳头乳晕复合体保留术(NSM)的患者,与乳晕后缘的永久性切片评估相比。

患者和方法

回顾性分析了术前和术后的参数,包括影像学数据、原发性肿瘤的组织学、生物学预后因素和辅助治疗方案;对于切缘接近/阳性的患者行乳头或乳头乳晕复合体切除术。主要终点是局部区域复发(LRR)。

结果

TND≤2cm 的患者浸润性导管癌的发生率显著更高(p<0.003),切缘小于 2mm 的比例更高(p<0.000)。11 例乳晕后缘标本在最终病理检查中呈阳性,7 例患者(63.6%)的再次切除标本中仍有肿瘤残留。在 31 至 33 个月的中位随访期间,未发生乳头乳晕复合体复发;无病生存率>96%,且 TND 亚组之间 LRR 分布均匀。

结论

术前乳腺 MRI 评估的 TND 并不影响保乳手术的安全性。乳晕后缘组织的永久性切片评估比冷冻切片更准确且更具成本效益。此外,延迟切除乳头和/或乳头乳晕复合体并未影响局部疾病控制。

相似文献

1
Tumor-to-nipple Distance Should Not Preclude Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients. Personal Experience and Literature Review.肿瘤至乳头距离不应排除乳腺癌患者行保乳头乳房切除术。个人经验与文献回顾。
Anticancer Res. 2020 Jun;40(6):3543-3550. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14343.
2
Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with short tumor-nipple distance.保乳手术中肿瘤-乳头距离较短患者的肿瘤学安全性。
Breast J. 2019 Jul;25(4):612-618. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13289. Epub 2019 May 13.
3
Risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with false-negative frozen section or close margins of retroareolar specimen in nipple-sparing mastectomy.保乳手术中乳晕后切缘或冰冻切片假阴性患者的局部区域复发风险。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4117-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2514-0. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
4
Recurrence Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.保乳术后及即刻乳房重建治疗单纯导管原位癌患者的复发结局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 May;27(5):1627-1635. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08184-z. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Reliability of sub-areolar sampling and frozen section in predicting occult nipple involvement in breast cancer patients.保留乳头的乳房切除术:乳晕下取样和冰冻切片在预测乳腺癌患者隐匿性乳头受累中的可靠性。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;44(11):1736-1742. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.059. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
6
Nipple-sparing mastectomy as treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: A 10-year follow-up study.保留乳头的乳房切除术治疗导管原位癌患者:一项10年随访研究。
Breast J. 2018 May;24(3):298-303. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12947. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
7
Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients with Breast Cancer and Tumor-to-Nipple Distance ≤ 1 cm: A Matched Cohort Study.保乳手术联合乳房重建治疗肿瘤距乳头距离≤1cm 的乳腺癌患者的安全性:一项匹配队列研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;28(8):4284-4291. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09427-0. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
8
The utility of intraoperative retroareolar margin frozen section assessment and the management of atypical epithelial proliferative lesions at the retroareolar margin in nipple-sparing mastectomies.乳头保留乳房切除术中乳晕后切缘冰冻切片评估的效用及乳晕后切缘非典型上皮增生性病变的处理
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2021 Apr;51:151697. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151697. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
9
[Surgical management of nipple areola complex in central breast cancer].[中央型乳腺癌乳头乳晕复合体的外科治疗]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Jul 23;44(7):761-766. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220408-00231.
10
Spare the Nipple: A Systematic Review of Tumor Nipple-Distance and Oncologic Outcomes in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.保留乳头:保留乳头乳房切除术的肿瘤乳头距离和肿瘤学结果的系统评价。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8381-8388. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14143-6. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards Standardized Language to Describe the Pathological Enhancement of the Nipple in NAC-Infiltrating Breast Tumors: A Retrospective Case Series Study.迈向标准化语言描述浸润性乳腺癌中乳头的病理强化:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 26;15(17):2155. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172155.
2
Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline.非转移性乳腺癌患者的乳房切除术后乳房重建:安大略省卫生厅(安大略省癌症护理)临床实践指南。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 17;32(6):357. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060357.
3
Impact of tumor-to-nipple distance on outcomes in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction.
肿瘤至乳头距离对机器人保乳乳房切除术及重建术预后的影响。
Discov Oncol. 2025 May 23;16(1):890. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02736-4.
4
Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.非转移性乳腺癌患者乳房切除术后乳房重建:一项系统评价
Curr Oncol. 2025 Apr 16;32(4):231. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32040231.
5
Long-term outcomes of skin-sparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy versus traditional mastectomy in breast cancer: a case-control study based on preoperative ultrasound and clinical indicators.乳腺癌保乳手术与传统乳房切除术的长期预后:一项基于术前超声和临床指标的病例对照研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb 14;23(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03695-4.
6
Spare the Nipple: A Systematic Review of Tumor Nipple-Distance and Oncologic Outcomes in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.保留乳头:保留乳头乳房切除术的肿瘤乳头距离和肿瘤学结果的系统评价。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8381-8388. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14143-6. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
7
Intraoperative Examination of Retro-Areolar Margin is not Routinely Necessary During Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Cancer.在保留乳头的乳腺癌切除术期间,常规行乳晕后缘术中检查并非必需。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6488-6496. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13726-7. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
8
Oncological Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in an Unselected Population Evaluated in a Single Center.单中心评估的未选择人群中保乳乳头切除术的肿瘤学结果。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;44(11):1052-1058. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1751286. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
Health-Related Quality of Life After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Results From the INSPIRE Registry.保乳术后的健康相关生活质量:INSPIRE 注册研究结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;29(3):1722-1734. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10930-1. Epub 2021 Nov 8.