• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三叶型筋膜皮瓣游离穿支皮瓣修复巨大骶尾部压疮

Clover-Style Fasciocutaneous Perforator Flap for Reconstruction of Massive Sacral Pressure Sores.

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopedics, Xuzhou Central Hospital.

Graduate School, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jan;86(1):62-66. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002442.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002442
PMID:32487808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7732153/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As a common complication of the long-term bedridden patients, pressure sore is a great challenge for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to explore the surgical method of using a clover-style fasciocutaneous perforator flap raised on the buttocks for the treatment of massive sacral pressure sores and report the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The study included 15 patients from January 2015 to June 2017 with an average age of 52.87 years (range, 32-73 years). The size of the sacral pressure sores ranged from 10 cm × 13 cm to 18 cm × 20 cm. The defects were reconstructed using a fasciocutaneous perforator flap raised on the buttocks after debridement and vacuum sealing drainage treatment for 1 to 2 weeks. All the donor areas were sutured directly.

RESULTS

All flaps survived completely; 13 patients achieved healing by primary intention, and the other 2 patients achieved healing by secondary intention. At the mean follow-up period of 20.8 months (range, 12-46 months), the appearance of the flap, including its texture and color, in all patients was satisfactory. No patients had deep infection, necrosis, or shrinkage of the flap during the follow-up period. One patient had a recurrent bedsore during the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The clover-style fasciocutaneous perforator flap is ideal for the reconstruction of massive sacral pressure sores because it is a relatively simple procedure and results in good appearance and function, few complications, and a low recurrence rate.

摘要

背景

压疮是长期卧床患者的常见并发症,对外科医生来说是一个巨大的挑战。本研究旨在探讨采用臀部三叶式筋膜皮瓣治疗大面积骶尾部压疮的手术方法,并报告其临床疗效。

方法

本研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月的 15 例患者,平均年龄 52.87 岁(范围,32-73 岁)。压疮大小为 10 cm×13 cm 至 18 cm×20 cm。清创及负压封闭引流治疗 1-2 周后,采用臀部三叶式筋膜皮瓣修复创面。所有供区均直接缝合。

结果

所有皮瓣均完全存活;13 例患者一期愈合,2 例患者二期愈合。在平均 20.8 个月(范围,12-46 个月)的随访中,所有患者皮瓣的外观、质地和颜色均满意。随访期间无深部感染、皮瓣坏死或收缩。1 例患者在随访 2 年内复发压疮。

结论

三叶式筋膜皮瓣是治疗大面积骶尾部压疮的理想选择,因为该手术方法相对简单,且皮瓣外观和功能良好,并发症少,复发率低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e78/7732153/32c3287edcda/spa-86-62-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e78/7732153/6bebf160b629/spa-86-62-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e78/7732153/30df3914acc3/spa-86-62-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e78/7732153/32c3287edcda/spa-86-62-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e78/7732153/6bebf160b629/spa-86-62-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e78/7732153/30df3914acc3/spa-86-62-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e78/7732153/32c3287edcda/spa-86-62-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Clover-Style Fasciocutaneous Perforator Flap for Reconstruction of Massive Sacral Pressure Sores.三叶型筋膜皮瓣游离穿支皮瓣修复巨大骶尾部压疮
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jan;86(1):62-66. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002442.
2
Comparison of gluteal perforator flaps and gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation flaps for reconstruction of sacral pressure sores.臀肌穿支皮瓣与臀肌筋膜皮瓣在骶尾部压疮修复中的比较。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Mar;67(3):377-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.029. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
3
A reusable perforator-preserving gluteal artery-based rotation fasciocutaneous flap for pressure sore reconstruction.一种可重复使用的保臀动脉穿支的基于旋转的臀动脉筋膜皮瓣用于压疮重建。
Microsurgery. 2012 Mar;32(3):189-95. doi: 10.1002/micr.20982. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
4
Parasacral Perforator Flaps for Reconstruction of Sacral Pressure Sores.用于骶部压疮重建的骶旁穿支皮瓣
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jul;75(1):62-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000024.
5
Comparison of outcomes of pressure sore reconstructions among perforator flaps, perforator-based rotation fasciocutaneous flaps, and musculocutaneous flaps.穿支皮瓣、穿支蒂旋转筋膜皮瓣和肌皮瓣在压疮重建中的效果比较。
Microsurgery. 2014 Oct;34(7):547-53. doi: 10.1002/micr.22257. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
6
Modification of the superior gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of sacral sores.改良臀上动脉穿支皮瓣修复骶尾部褥疮。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Apr;67(4):526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.031. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
7
[Clinical efficacy of artery perforator-based flap in the repair of gluteal-sacral pressure sores].[基于动脉穿支皮瓣修复臀骶部压疮的临床疗效]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2007 Feb;23(1):32-5.
8
Use of Perforator-Based Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Pressure Sore Reconstruction: Single-Perforator-Based Versus Multiple-Perforator-Based Flaps.基于穿支的筋膜皮瓣在压疮重建中的应用:单穿支皮瓣与多穿支皮瓣的比较
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;40(4):540-8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0662-5. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
9
[Clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator island flap in repair of sacral pressure ulcer].臀上动脉穿支岛状皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的临床疗效
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2019 May 20;35(5):367-370. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.05.008.
10
[Clinical application of modified upper gluteal rhomboid fasciocutaneous flap in repairing sacrococcygeal pressure sores].改良臀上菱形筋膜皮瓣在修复骶尾部压疮中的临床应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Mar;26(3):319-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Various Flaps Used for Reconstruction of Pressure Injuries: A Narrative Review.用于压力性损伤重建的各种皮瓣:一项叙述性综述。
World J Plast Surg. 2025;14(1):3-9. doi: 10.61186/wjps.14.1.3.
2
A Guide to Perforator Flap Selection for Buttock Pressure Sore Reconstruction.穿支皮瓣选择指南用于臀部压疮重建。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Feb 1;92(2):222-229. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003753. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
[Influence factors of poor efficacy after flap repair operation in patients with pressure ulcers].[压力性溃疡患者皮瓣修复术后疗效不佳的影响因素]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Dec 20;38(12):1156-1161. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220228-00041.