School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney.
School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney; and Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney.
Phys Ther. 2020 Aug 31;100(9):1516-1541. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa101.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies aimed at improving the adherence of physical therapists' treatment choices to clinical practice guidelines for a range of musculoskeletal conditions.
For this review, searches were performed in several databases combining terms synonymous with "practice patterns" and "physical therapy" until August 2019. The review included randomized controlled trials that investigated any intervention to improve the adherence of physical therapists' treatment choices to clinical practice guidelines or research evidence. Treatment choices assessed by surveys, audits of clinical notes, and treatment recording forms were the primary measures of adherence. Self-reported guideline adherence was the secondary measure. Three reviewers independently assessed risk of bias. Because of heterogeneity across studies, only a narrative synthesis of the results was performed.
Nine studies were included. Four demonstrated a positive effect on at least 1 measure of treatment choices for low back pain and acute whiplash. One involved a comparison with no intervention, and 3 involved a comparison with another active intervention. The interventions that demonstrated a positive effect included dissemination of clinical practice guidelines, with additional elements including interactive educational meetings (3 studies), tailored interventions and monitoring of the performance of health care delivery (1 study), peer assessment (1 study), and local opinion leaders plus educational outreach visits (1 study).
Although this review revealed limited trials evaluating interventions to increase physical therapists' use of evidence-based treatments for musculoskeletal conditions compared with no intervention, it highlighted some interventions that may be effective.
Dissemination of clinical practice guidelines, interactive educational meetings, tailored interventions and monitoring the performance of health care delivery, peer assessment, and use of local opinion leaders plus educational outreach visits should be implemented to improve physical therapists' adherence to clinical practice guidelines for a range of musculoskeletal conditions.
本研究旨在评估旨在提高物理治疗师治疗选择对一系列肌肉骨骼疾病临床实践指南的依从性的实施策略的有效性。
在本次综述中,我们在多个数据库中进行了搜索,这些数据库结合了与“实践模式”和“物理治疗”同义的术语,直到 2019 年 8 月。综述纳入了旨在提高物理治疗师治疗选择对临床实践指南或研究证据的依从性的任何干预的随机对照试验。通过调查、临床记录审核和治疗记录表格评估的治疗选择是依从性的主要衡量标准。自我报告的指南依从性是次要衡量标准。三名审查员独立评估了偏倚风险。由于研究之间存在异质性,仅对结果进行了叙述性综合。
纳入了 9 项研究。其中 4 项研究在至少 1 项针对腰痛和急性颈痛的治疗选择措施上显示出积极效果。其中 1 项研究与无干预进行了比较,3 项研究与另一种积极干预进行了比较。显示出积极效果的干预措施包括临床实践指南的传播,其他内容包括互动式教育会议(3 项研究)、量身定制的干预措施以及医疗服务绩效的监测(1 项研究)、同行评估(1 项研究)以及当地意见领袖加教育外展访问(1 项研究)。
尽管本次综述发现评估干预措施以增加物理治疗师对肌肉骨骼疾病的基于证据的治疗方法的使用的试验有限,且与无干预相比,但是它突出了一些可能有效的干预措施。
传播临床实践指南、互动式教育会议、量身定制的干预措施以及医疗服务绩效的监测、同行评估以及使用当地意见领袖加教育外展访问,应实施这些措施以提高物理治疗师对一系列肌肉骨骼疾病的临床实践指南的依从性。