Torwichien Patitta, Vongsirinavarat Mantana, Sakulsriprasert Prasert, Somprasong Sirikarn
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Hong Kong Physiother J. 2020 Jun;40(1):51-62. doi: 10.1142/S1013702520500067. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
Other than pathoanatomical diagnosis, physical therapy managements need the diagnosis of movement-related impairments for guiding treatment interventions. The classification system of the Movement System Impairment (MSI) has been adopted to label the musculoskeletal disorders in physical therapy practice. However, reliability study of this classification system in individuals with shoulder pain has not been reported in the literature.
This paper investigated the intertester reliability of the diagnosis based on the MSI classification system in individuals with shoulder pain.
The patients with shoulder pain, between the ages 18-60 years, were recruited if he or she had pain between 30 and 70 on the 100 mm visual analog scale for at least three months. The examiners who were two physical therapists with different clinical experiences received a standardized training program. They independently examined 45 patients in random order. Each patient was examined by both therapists on the same day. The standardized examination scheme based on the MSI approach was used. Patients were identified to subgroup syndromes according to scapular and humeral syndromes and also determining their subcategory syndromes. Six scapular subcategory syndromes included downward rotated, depressed, abducted, wing, internal rotated/anterior tilted, and elevated. Three humeral subcategory syndromes were anterior glide, superior glide, and medial rotated. More than one subgroup and subcategory of syndromes could be identified in each patient. The test results of each session were blinded to another therapist. The percentages of agreement and kappa statistic were determined.
The results showed that agreement levels in identifying subgroup syndromes was fair (71.11% agreement, kappa coefficient 0.34) and classifying subcategories syndromes were poor to substantial (73.33-91.11% agreement, kappa coefficient 0.20 0.66). The overall agreement and kappa value of the MSI classification of subcategory syndromes was poor (kappa coefficient 0.11; 95% CI 0.05-0.18). The agreement level of subcategories for scapular depression and humeral superior glide syndromes was substantial. The scapular winging, depression, and downward rotation were the three syndromes that were most frequently identified by both the examiners.
The intertester reliability between therapists with different experience according to the MSI approach for shoulder pain classification was generally acceptable to poor due to the nature of the classification system. The standardized procedure and intensive training can be used for inculcating novice therapists with adequate level of intertester reliability of examination.
除病理解剖诊断外,物理治疗管理还需要对与运动相关的损伤进行诊断,以指导治疗干预。运动系统损伤(MSI)分类系统已被用于在物理治疗实践中标记肌肉骨骼疾病。然而,该分类系统在肩痛患者中的可靠性研究尚未见文献报道。
本文研究基于MSI分类系统对肩痛患者进行诊断的检查者间可靠性。
招募年龄在18至60岁之间、在100mm视觉模拟量表上疼痛程度为30至70且持续至少三个月的肩痛患者。两名具有不同临床经验的物理治疗师作为检查者接受标准化培训。他们以随机顺序独立检查45名患者。每位患者在同一天由两名治疗师进行检查。采用基于MSI方法的标准化检查方案。根据肩胛和肱骨综合征对患者进行亚组综合征识别,并确定其亚类综合征。六种肩胛亚类综合征包括向下旋转、下沉、外展、翼状、内旋/前倾和上抬。三种肱骨亚类综合征为前滑、上滑和内旋。每位患者可能被识别出不止一种亚组和亚类综合征。每次检查结果对另一名治疗师保密。确定一致性百分比和kappa统计量。
结果显示,在识别亚组综合征方面的一致性水平为中等(一致性71.11%,kappa系数0.34),在分类亚类综合征方面为差到中等(一致性73.33 - 91.11%,kappa系数0.20 - 0.66)。MSI亚类综合征分类的总体一致性和kappa值较差(kappa系数0.11;95%可信区间0.05 - 0.18)。肩胛下沉和肱骨上滑综合征亚类的一致性水平为中等。肩胛翼状、下沉和向下旋转是两名检查者最常识别出的三种综合征。
由于分类系统的性质,根据MSI方法对肩痛进行分类时,不同经验治疗师之间的检查者间可靠性一般为可接受至较差。标准化程序和强化培训可用于使新手治疗师达到足够水平的检查者间可靠性。