Suppr超能文献

依诺肝素与利伐沙班治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞的对比分析:来自一家三级医疗癌症中心的经验

Comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre.

作者信息

Faqah Anadil, Sheikh Hassan, Bakar Muhammad Abu, Tayyaab Fatima, Khawaja Sahrish

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Shaukat Khanam Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan.

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Shaukat Khanam Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Thromb J. 2020 May 24;18:8. doi: 10.1186/s12959-020-00221-2. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. While newer data on use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) is promising; its data is still few and inconsistent across literature. We designed the study to assess if rivaroxaban would be an appealing alternate choice to treat CAT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin in cancer patients after developing a symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Baseline patient characteristics and laboratory values were assessed in each arm. Primary efficacy outcome was measured by radiographically confirmed VTE recurrence at different intervals. Primary safety outcome was measured by presence of major and minor bleeding using the ISTH scale.

RESULTS

Our study recruited 150 cancer patients with radiologically confirmed DVT and PE; 80 patients were evaluated in enoxaparin arm and 70 patients in rivaroxaban arm. Our results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the incidence of VTE recurrence at 6 months between the enoxaparin and rivaroxaban arm (10% vs 14.2%,  = 0.42). Historically significant risk factors for VTE in cancer patients such as high platelet count, high leukocyte count, low hemoglobin level, high risk gastrointestinal, genitourinary and lung cancers were not found to be significantly associated with the risk of VTE recurrence. Primary safety outcome analysis also showed no statistically significant difference in major (11.2% vs 11.4%) and minor (15% vs 10%) bleeding between enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban arm respectively ( = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that there was no significant difference seen between the efficacy and safety profile of enoxaparin and rivaroxaban in our cancer patient population.

摘要

背景

癌症患者的静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)与死亡率和发病率的增加相关。虽然关于直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)用于治疗癌症相关血栓形成(CAT)的最新数据很有前景;但其数据仍然很少且文献报道不一致。我们设计了这项研究,以评估利伐沙班是否是治疗CAT的一个有吸引力的替代选择。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估利伐沙班与依诺肝素在癌症患者出现症状性深静脉血栓形成(DVT)或肺栓塞(PE)后的疗效和安全性。对每组患者的基线特征和实验室值进行评估。主要疗效指标通过不同时间间隔影像学证实的VTE复发情况来衡量。主要安全性指标通过使用国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)量表评估的严重和轻微出血情况来衡量。

结果

我们的研究招募了150例经影像学证实患有DVT和PE的癌症患者;依诺肝素组评估了80例患者,利伐沙班组评估了70例患者。我们的结果显示,依诺肝素组和利伐沙班组在6个月时VTE复发率之间没有统计学显著差异(10%对14.2%,P = 0.42)。未发现癌症患者VTE的历史显著危险因素,如高血小板计数、高白细胞计数、低血红蛋白水平、高风险胃肠道癌、泌尿生殖系统癌和肺癌与VTE复发风险有显著关联。主要安全性指标分析还显示,依诺肝素组与利伐沙班组在严重出血(11.2%对11.4%)和轻微出血(15%对10%)方面分别没有统计学显著差异(P = 0.65)。

结论

我们得出结论,在我们的癌症患者群体中,依诺肝素和利伐沙班在疗效和安全性方面没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0921/7245926/a39681a67dd3/12959_2020_221_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验