Richels Lindsay, Sutherland Wilson, Prettyshield Kyle, Kappel Joanne, McCarron Michelle, Richardson Bonnie
College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Canada.
Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 May 20;7:2054358120914689. doi: 10.1177/2054358120914689. eCollection 2020.
Renal replacement options or dialysis can be delivered in the home setting or hospital setting. Home dialysis offers a number of benefits over hospital-delivered dialysis. These advantages include improved quality of life, less travel, and fewer dietary restrictions. Despite the benefits, home-based dialysis therapies are significantly underutilized by First Nations with only 16.2% uptake versus 25.7% uptake in non-First Nations people in Saskatchewan. It is important to recognize that First Nations have a greater burden of end-stage renal disease including higher prevalence, younger age at diagnosis, increased severity of disease, mortality at an earlier age, and increased travel distance to access kidney services.
The goal of this study is to identify the existing barriers to home peritoneal dialysis and provide insight for future programs in Saskatchewan First Nations communities in a culturally meaningful framework.
Through qualitative research utilizing sharing circles and individual interviews, barriers to utilizing home-based dialysis were identified.
Four sharing circles were held and interviews were conducted with four First Nations dialysis patients.
Total number of participants in sharing circles were 67. Sharing circles were composed of patients with chronic kidney disease, patients on hospital-based dialysis, patients on home-based peritoneal dialysis, family members, health care providers (nurses, physicians, dietitians, primary care director, and coordinators). Face-to-face interviews were conducted with four First Nations dialysis patients.
The data from the sharing circles and interviews were transcribed and analyzed by a PhD researcher using constructivist grounded theory, with elements of narrative inquiry to ascertain participants' experiences of care. Data were coded and then grouped into categories using qualitative research software NVivo. Saturation of data was achieved.
Documenting and recounting patient and community experience with chronic kidney disease through sharing circles involving patients, family members, and health care providers has been the central information base for this project. Qualitative interviews were conducted with patients who currently use home dialysis and those who travel to hospital for dialysis. Written consent was obtained from all participants. Information was gathered via audio recording of all sharing circles and interviews. Transcription of the interviews was completed with confidentiality maintained during transcription.
The main theme of our results was addressing the underutilization of home-based peritoneal dialysis in First Nations Communities. Five subthemes emerged from the main theme and included logistics, education and information, training and support, community support, and culture and leadership. Through sharing circles, a secondary theme of observations about living with chronic kidney disease and experiences of being on dialysis was explored.
A small number of First Nations communities were involved in this project, and although the data reached saturation, we cannot presume that the information is representative of all First Nations in Saskatchewan. There were a limited number of patients currently on home-based peritoneal dialysis, and therefore their perceptions may not be adequately captured. Participant characteristics (patient, caregiver, nurse, etc) were not captured when speaking in the sharing circles, and therefore participants are not classified when quoted.
Strategies to help improve home-based dialysis included improved education, local support, integrated traditional medicine, cultural sensitivity, and leadership prioritization.
肾脏替代治疗方案或透析可以在家庭环境或医院环境中进行。家庭透析相较于医院透析具有诸多益处。这些优势包括生活质量提高、出行减少以及饮食限制更少。尽管有这些益处,但第一民族对家庭透析疗法的利用率显著偏低,在萨斯喀彻温省,第一民族的利用率仅为16.2%,而非第一民族人群的利用率为25.7%。必须认识到,第一民族终末期肾病的负担更重,包括患病率更高、诊断时年龄更小、疾病严重程度增加、更早的年龄死亡率以及前往肾脏服务机构的出行距离增加。
本研究的目的是确定家庭腹膜透析存在的现有障碍,并在具有文化意义的框架内为萨斯喀彻温省第一民族社区未来的项目提供见解。
通过利用分享圈和个人访谈的定性研究,确定了使用家庭透析的障碍。
举办了四个分享圈,并对四名第一民族透析患者进行了访谈。
分享圈的参与者总数为67人。分享圈由慢性肾病患者、医院透析患者、家庭腹膜透析患者、家庭成员、医疗保健提供者(护士、医生、营养师、初级保健主任和协调员)组成。对四名第一民族透析患者进行了面对面访谈。
分享圈和访谈的数据由一名博士研究员使用建构主义扎根理论进行转录和分析,并融入叙事探究元素以确定参与者的护理体验。数据进行编码,然后使用定性研究软件NVivo归类。数据达到饱和。
通过涉及患者、家庭成员和医疗保健提供者的分享圈记录和讲述患者及社区慢性肾病的经历,一直是本项目的核心信息基础。对目前使用家庭透析的患者和前往医院进行透析的患者进行了定性访谈。获得了所有参与者的书面同意。通过对所有分享圈和访谈进行录音收集信息。访谈转录完成,转录过程中保持保密。
我们结果的主要主题是解决第一民族社区家庭腹膜透析利用率低的问题。从主要主题中出现了五个子主题,包括后勤、教育与信息、培训与支持、社区支持以及文化与领导力。通过分享圈,探讨了关于慢性肾病生活以及透析经历的第二个观察主题。
本项目涉及的第一民族社区数量较少,尽管数据达到饱和,但我们不能假定这些信息代表了萨斯喀彻温省所有第一民族。目前进行家庭腹膜透析的患者数量有限,因此他们的看法可能没有得到充分体现。在分享圈发言时未记录参与者特征(患者、护理人员、护士等),因此在引用时未对参与者进行分类。
有助于改善家庭透析的策略包括加强教育、提供当地支持、整合传统医学、提高文化敏感性以及优先考虑领导力。