Mayekar Rahul Vishwanath, Paradkar Gopalkrishna Vinayak, Bhosale Archana Anilkumar, Sachan Rekha, Beeram Sumalatha, Anand Ashok Ramachandra, Mundle Shuchita Ramesh, Trivedi Yamini, Md Rashmi, Patole Kiran Pandharinath, Sambarey Pradip Wamanrao, Daftary Gautam Vinod, John James, Divekar Ganesh Harishchandra
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College & Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rajiv Gandhi Medical College & Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Hospital, Thane, India.
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 May;63(3):315-322. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.315. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant anti-D (R-anti-D) with conventional polyclonal anti-D (Poly anti-D) in preventing maternal-fetal rhesus D (RhD) alloimmunization and to investigate the immunogenicity of R-anti-D.
This was a randomized, open-label, multi-center clinical trial conducted in RhD-negative pregnant women who did not receive antenatal anti-D who delivered RhD-positive babies and showed negative indirect Coombs tests (ICTs) at baseline. The women were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to R-anti-D or Poly anti-D groups and were administered 300 mcg (IM) of the corresponding drug within 72 hours of delivery. ICT was performed 72 hours, 90 days, and 180 days after anti-D injection. Serum samples were collected to check for the development of antibodies against R-anti-D at days 90 and 180, using bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The proportion of subjects who had positive ICT results at days 90 and 180 were compared between the groups using Fisher's exact test.
A total of 144 women were randomized to the R-anti-D group and 71 to the Poly anti-D group. Three women in the R-anti-D and none in the Poly anti-D group had a positive ICT result at day 90. No woman in either group had positive ICT result at day 180. Both drugs were well tolerated with only 4 reports of adverse events in each group-all were mild, non-serious, and resolved without sequelae. No subject developed antibodies against R-anti-D.
The studied R-anti-D is comparable in efficacy to conventional Poly anti-D and is safe and non-immunogenic. Clinical Trials Registry of India Identifier: Clinical Trials Registry of India Identifier: CTRI/2017/03/008101.
比较重组抗D(R-抗D)与传统多克隆抗D(多克隆抗D)在预防母胎恒河猴D(RhD)同种免疫方面的疗效和安全性,并研究R-抗D的免疫原性。
这是一项随机、开放标签、多中心临床试验,在未接受产前抗D治疗、分娩RhD阳性婴儿且基线间接抗人球蛋白试验(ICT)为阴性的RhD阴性孕妇中进行。这些女性按2:1的比例随机分为R-抗D组或多克隆抗D组,并在分娩后72小时内肌肉注射300微克相应药物。在抗D注射后72小时、90天和180天进行ICT检测。在第90天和180天采集血清样本,使用桥接酶联免疫吸附试验检测抗R-抗D抗体的产生情况。使用Fisher精确检验比较两组在第90天和180天ICT结果为阳性的受试者比例。
共有144名女性被随机分配到R-抗D组,71名被分配到多克隆抗D组。在第90天,R-抗D组有3名女性ICT结果为阳性,多克隆抗D组无。两组在第180天均无女性ICT结果为阳性。两种药物耐受性良好,每组仅有4例不良事件报告——均为轻度、非严重,且无后遗症。没有受试者产生抗R-抗D抗体。
所研究的R-抗D在疗效上与传统多克隆抗D相当,且安全、无免疫原性。印度临床试验注册标识符:CTRI/2017/03/008101。