Kondo S
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama University Medical School, Japan.
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1988 Nov;62(11):977-90.
To evaluate the clinical value of hip arthrography, especially two-directional arthrography, the author compared the treatment results of three different groups, Group A: cases treated without arthrography, Group B: cases treated using anteroposterior arthrography and Group C: cases treated using two-directional arthrography. With Lorenz's method, all three groups achieved about 40% success to G-I, II by Severin's classification. G-III, IV was obtained in Group A, B and C at 50.4%, 19.5% and 2.8%, while cases of open reduction at 3.8%, 37.0% and 55.6%, respectively. By selecting the cases that may obtain G-III, IV with Lorenz's method and by applying open reduction to them, in Group C, reduction was obtained in 93.8% of cases treated with Lorenz's method and 91.7% when cases treated with open reduction were included. Using two-directional arthrography, cases which should not be treated conservatively may be identified to apply open reduction to obtain better overall results.
为评估髋关节造影尤其是双向造影的临床价值,作者比较了三组不同病例的治疗结果,A组:未行造影治疗的病例;B组:采用前后位造影治疗的病例;C组:采用双向造影治疗的病例。采用洛伦兹方法,按照塞韦林分类,三组中G-I、II级的成功率均约为40%。A组、B组和C组中G-III、IV级的比例分别为50.4%、19.5%和2.8%,而行切开复位的病例比例分别为3.8%、37.0%和55.6%。通过用洛伦兹方法选择可能达到G-III、IV级的病例并对其施行切开复位,在C组中,采用洛伦兹方法治疗的病例复位成功率为93.8%,若将行切开复位的病例纳入则为91.7%。使用双向造影,可以识别出不应采用保守治疗的病例,从而施行切开复位以获得更好的总体治疗效果。