• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏移植

Heart Transplantation

作者信息

Ahmed Talha, Jain Ankit

机构信息

University Of Maryland

Augusta University

PMID:32491503
Abstract

Patients with advanced heart failure requiring mechanical circulatory support and inotropic support have a poor prognosis. Cardiac transplantation in a selected cohort of such patients can be the treatment of choice. The early experience with heart transplants was disappointing. In 1967, the first patient to receive a heart transplant died of an overwhelming infection after 17 days. However, with the advent of immunosuppressive therapies and a better understanding of human anatomy and surgical techniques, cardiac transplantation started gaining popularity in the 1990s. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) reported maximum transplants during the period of 1993-2004; however, in recent years, the numbers reported have grown even further. With well-defined indications now set forth by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America (ACC/AHA/HFSA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in collaboration with ISHLT, more people are on the waiting list than is the availability of the organ itself. This review will focus on the updated guidelines on indications and contraindications of a heart transplant, commonly utilized techniques, post-transplant immunosuppression, and common complications of the procedure.

摘要

需要机械循环支持和正性肌力支持的晚期心力衰竭患者预后较差。在这类经过挑选的患者队列中,心脏移植可能是首选治疗方法。早期心脏移植的经验并不理想。1967年,首例接受心脏移植的患者在术后17天死于严重感染。然而,随着免疫抑制疗法的出现以及对人体解剖学和手术技术的更深入了解,心脏移植在20世纪90年代开始受到欢迎。国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)报告称,1993年至2004年期间心脏移植数量最多;然而,近年来,报告的移植数量进一步增加。随着美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心力衰竭学会(ACC/AHA/HFSA)与欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)联合国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)明确了心脏移植的适应症,现在等待名单上的人数超过了可供移植的器官数量。本综述将重点关注心脏移植适应症和禁忌症的最新指南、常用技术、移植后免疫抑制以及该手术的常见并发症。

相似文献

1
Heart Transplantation心脏移植
2
2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA/ISHLT/ACP Advanced Training Statement on Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology (Revision of the ACCF/AHA/ACP/HFSA/ISHLT 2010 Clinical Competence Statement on Management of Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant): A Report of the ACC Competency Management Committee.2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心力衰竭学会/国际心脏和肺移植学会/美国内科医师学会关于晚期心力衰竭和移植心脏病学的高级培训声明(对美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/美国内科医师学会/美国心力衰竭学会/国际心脏和肺移植学会2010年晚期心力衰竭患者管理和心脏移植临床能力声明的修订):美国心脏病学会能力管理委员会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 20;69(24):2977-3001. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA/ISHLT/ACP Advanced Training Statement on Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology (Revision of the ACCF/AHA/ACP/HFSA/ISHLT 2010 Clinical Competence Statement on Management of Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant): A Report of the ACC Competency Management Committee.2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心力衰竭学会/国际心脏和肺移植学会/美国内科医师学会关于晚期心力衰竭和移植心脏病学的高级培训声明(修订ACCF/AHA/ACP/HFSA/ISHLT 2010年关于晚期心力衰竭患者管理和心脏移植的临床能力声明):美国心脏病学会能力管理委员会报告
J Card Fail. 2017 Jun;23(6):492-511. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
4
2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA/ISHLT/ACP Advanced Training Statement on Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology (Revision of the ACCF/AHA/ACP/HFSA/ISHLT 2010 Clinical Competence Statement on Management of Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant): A Report of the ACC Competency Management Committee.2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心力衰竭学会/国际心肺移植学会/美国内科医师学会关于晚期心力衰竭和移植心脏病学的高级培训声明(对美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/美国内科医师学会/美国心力衰竭学会/国际心肺移植学会2010年晚期心力衰竭患者管理和心脏移植临床能力声明的修订):美国心脏病学会能力管理委员会报告
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/HHF.0000000000000021.
5
ACC/AHA/HFSA 2022 and ESC 2021 guidelines on heart failure comparison.ACC/AHA/HFSA 2022 与 ESC 2021 心力衰竭指南比较。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;10(3):1531-1544. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14255. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
6
HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations: developed in partnership with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Heart Failure Association of ESC (HFA), and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA). Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association (a registered branch of the ESC), the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association.心血管植入式电子设备(CIEDs)监测的HRS/EHRA专家共识:技术、适应症、人员、频率及伦理考量的描述:与心律协会(HRS)和欧洲心律协会(EHRA)合作制定;并与美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)、欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)及美国心力衰竭学会(HFSA)协作。得到心律协会、欧洲心律协会(ESC注册分支)、美国心脏病学会、美国心脏协会认可。
Europace. 2008 Jun;10(6):707-25. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun122. Epub 2008 May 14.
7
SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021.SCAI休克分期分类专家共识更新:验证研究的回顾与纳入:本声明于2021年12月获得美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)、危重病医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)的认可。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 8;79(9):933-946. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021.SCAI休克分期分类专家共识更新:验证研究的回顾与纳入:本声明于2021年12月得到美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)、危重病医学学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)的认可。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Jan 30;1(1):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2021.100008. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
9
Head-to-head comparison between recommendations by the ESC and ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guidelines.ESC 和 ACC/AHA/HFSA 心力衰竭指南推荐的头对头比较。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;24(6):916-926. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2542. Epub 2022 May 29.
10
Head-to-Head Comparison and Temporal Trends of Cardiac MRI Recommendations in ESC versus ACC/AHA Guidelines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.头对头比较和 ESC 与 ACC/AHA 指南中心脏 MRI 推荐的时间趋势:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024 Jun;6(3):e230271. doi: 10.1148/ryct.230271.