Deckert J, Bisserbe J C, Klein E, Marangos P J
Unit on Neurochemistry, NIMH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
J Neurosci. 1988 Jul;8(7):2338-49. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-07-02338.1988.
Adenosine uptake sites have been characterized and localized in guinea pig and pointer dog brain by in vitro autoradiography, using as probes 3H-nitrobenzylthioinosine (3H-NBI) and the recently available 3H-dipyridamole (3H-DPR). In guinea pig brain and, to a lesser extent, in pointer dog brain, 3H-DPR was found to label more high-affinity binding sites than 3H-NBI and NBI inhibited 3H-DPR binding having pseudo-Hill coefficients smaller than 0.5. 3H-DPR and 3H-NBI labeled brain structures with different intensities in guinea pig brain, as was revealed by quantitative analysis. While the intensity of 3H-DPR binding varied about 4-fold in neuron-containing structures, 8-fold differences were observed for 3H-NBI binding with phylo- and ontogenetically older brain areas such as hypothalamus and various brain stem structures showing relatively higher densities. These findings raise the interesting possibility of adenosine uptake site heterogeneity (NBI-sensitive and insensitive) in guinea pig brain, complementing the well-established adenosine receptor heterogeneity (A1 and A2). As adenosine's neurodepressant effects are believed to be mainly mediated by adenosine A1-receptors, these were localized using 3H-cyclohexyl-adenosine (3H-CHA) as a ligand probe. In guinea pig brain, the highest receptor densities were seen in hippocampus and claustrum, while only relatively low levels were found in hypothalamus and various brain stem structures. As was previously described for rat brain, major discrepancies in the regional distribution of adenosine A1-receptors and adenosine uptake sites, as labeled by 3H-NBI, were seen in guinea pig brain. These discrepancies were only partly abolished (e.g., in cerebellum) by the use of 3H-DPR as an additional ligand probe for adenosine uptake sites. Adenosine uptake site heterogeneity, therefore, probably does not explain the previously described discrepancies in rodent brain between the distribution of adenosine A1-receptors and uptake sites. Because of the low affinity of 3H-DPR for adenosine uptake sites in rat and mouse brain, these species could not be investigated with this new radioligand probe. In pointer dog brain, as compared to guinea pig brain, a more similar distribution pattern of adenosine A1-receptors and adenosine uptake sites in the brain structures investigated (e.g., hippocampus) could be observed. The situation in guinea pig brain can, therefore, not be universalized to other species.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
通过体外放射自显影技术,利用³H-硝基苄硫基肌苷(³H-NBI)和最近可得的³H-双嘧达莫(³H-DPR)作为探针,已对豚鼠和指示犬大脑中的腺苷摄取位点进行了表征和定位。在豚鼠大脑中,以及在较小程度上在指示犬大脑中,发现³H-DPR标记的高亲和力结合位点比³H-NBI更多,并且NBI抑制³H-DPR结合,其伪希尔系数小于0.5。定量分析表明,在豚鼠大脑中,³H-DPR和³H-NBI标记的脑结构强度不同。虽然³H-DPR结合强度在含神经元结构中变化约4倍,但³H-NBI结合在系统发育和个体发育上较古老的脑区(如下丘脑和各种脑干结构,显示相对较高的密度)中观察到8倍的差异。这些发现提出了豚鼠大脑中腺苷摄取位点异质性(对NBI敏感和不敏感)的有趣可能性,补充了已确立的腺苷受体异质性(A1和A2)。由于腺苷的神经抑制作用被认为主要由腺苷A1受体介导,因此使用³H-环己基腺苷(³H-CHA)作为配体探针来定位这些受体。在豚鼠大脑中,海马体和屏状核中受体密度最高,而下丘脑和各种脑干结构中的水平相对较低。如先前对大鼠大脑所描述的,在豚鼠大脑中,³H-NBI标记的腺苷A1受体和腺苷摄取位点的区域分布存在重大差异。通过使用³H-DPR作为腺苷摄取位点的额外配体探针,这些差异仅部分消除(例如在小脑中)。因此,腺苷摄取位点异质性可能无法解释先前描述的啮齿动物大脑中腺苷A1受体分布与摄取位点之间的差异。由于³H-DPR对大鼠和小鼠大脑中腺苷摄取位点的亲和力较低,因此无法用这种新的放射性配体探针研究这些物种。与豚鼠大脑相比,在指示犬大脑中,在所研究的脑结构(如海马体)中可以观察到腺苷A1受体和腺苷摄取位点更相似的分布模式。因此,豚鼠大脑中的情况不能推广到其他物种。(摘要截短为400字)