Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington (J Beck, EM Sullivan, and DJ Opel), Seattle, Wash.
Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Dentistry (CL Randall), Seattle, Wash.
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Nov-Dec;20(8):1198-1205. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 May 31.
Moral distress is increasingly identified as a major problem affecting healthcare professionals, but it is poorly characterized among pediatricians. Our objective was to assess the sources of moral distress in residents and pediatric hospitalist attendings and to examine the association of moral distress with reported burnout.
Cross-sectional survey from January through March 2019 of pediatric residents and hospital medicine attending physicians affiliated with 4 free-standing children's hospitals. Moral distress was measured using the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP). Burnout was measured using 2 items adapted from the Maslach Burnout Inventory.
Respondents included 288 of 541 eligible pediatric residents (response rate: 53%) and 118 of 168 pediatric hospitalists (response rate: 70%; total response rate: 57%). The mean MMD-HP composite score was 93.4 (SD = 42.5). Residents reported significantly higher frequency scores (residents: M = 38.5 vs. hospitalists: M = 33.3; difference: 5.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-7.5) and composite scores (residents: M = 97.6 vs hospitalists: M = 83.0; difference:14.6, 95% CI, 5.7-23.5) than hospitalists. The most frequent source of moral distress was "having excessive documentation requirements that compromise patient care," and the most intense source of moral distress was "be[ing] required to work with abusive patients/family members who are compromising quality of care." Significantly higher mean MMD-HP composite scores were observed among participants reporting that they felt burned out at least once per week (M= 114.6 vs M= 82.3; difference: 32.3, 95% CI, 23.5-41.2).
Pediatric residents and hospitalists report experiencing moral distress from a variety of patient-, team-, and system-level sources, and this distress is associated with burnout.
道德困境日益被认为是影响医疗保健专业人员的一个主要问题,但在儿科医生中,这种情况的特征描述很差。我们的目的是评估住院医师和儿科医院医生的道德困境来源,并研究道德困境与报告的倦怠之间的关系。
2019 年 1 月至 3 月,对 4 家独立儿童医院附属的儿科住院医师和医院内科主治医生进行横断面调查。使用医疗保健专业人员道德困境衡量量表(MMD-HP)来衡量道德困境。倦怠使用来自 Maslach 倦怠量表的 2 项适应项来衡量。
受访者包括符合条件的 541 名儿科住院医师中的 288 名(应答率:53%)和 168 名儿科医院医生中的 118 名(应答率:70%;总应答率:57%)。MMD-HP 综合评分的平均值为 93.4(SD=42.5)。住院医师报告的频率得分明显更高(住院医师:M=38.5,医院医生:M=33.3;差异:5.2,95%置信区间[CI],2.9-7.5)和综合得分(住院医师:M=97.6,医院医生:M=83.0;差异:14.6,95% CI,5.7-23.5)高于医院医生。道德困境最常见的来源是“有过多的文件要求,影响患者护理”,道德困境最强烈的来源是“被迫与影响护理质量的虐待患者/家庭成员合作”。报告每周至少感到一次倦怠的参与者的平均 MMD-HP 综合评分明显更高(M=114.6,M=82.3;差异:32.3,95% CI,23.5-41.2)。
儿科住院医师和医院医生报告了各种来自患者、团队和系统层面的道德困境,并且这种困境与倦怠有关。