Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
CJEM. 2020 Sep;22(5):687-691. doi: 10.1017/cem.2020.377.
Prognosis and disposition among older emergency department (ED) patients with suspected infection remains challenging. Frailty is increasingly recognized as a predictor of poor prognosis among critically ill patients; however, its association with clinical outcomes among older ED patients with suspected infection is unknown.
We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study at two tertiary care EDs. We included older ED patients (≥75 years) with suspected infection. Frailty at baseline (before index illness) was explicitly measured for all patients by the treating physicians using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). We defined frailty as a CFS 5-8. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for known confounders. We also compared the prognostic accuracy of frailty with the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) criteria.
We enrolled 203 patients, of whom 117 (57.6%) were frail. Frail patients were more likely to develop septic shock (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.51) and more likely to die within 30 days of ED presentation (aOR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.02-5.24). Sensitivity for mortality was highest among the CFS (73.1%; 95% CI, 52.2-88.4), compared with SIRS ≥ 2 (65.4%; 95% CI, 44.3-82.8) or qSOFA ≥ 2 (38.4; 95% CI, 20.2-59.4).
Frailty is a highly prevalent prognostic factor that can be used to risk-stratify older ED patients with suspected infection. ED clinicians should consider screening for frailty to optimize disposition in this population.
对于老年急诊科(ED)疑似感染患者的预后和处置仍然具有挑战性。虚弱越来越被认为是危重病患者预后不良的预测指标;然而,其与老年 ED 疑似感染患者临床结局的关系尚不清楚。
我们在两家三级护理 ED 进行了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。我们纳入了年龄≥75 岁的老年 ED 疑似感染患者。所有患者的基线(在基础疾病之前)虚弱情况均由主治医生使用临床虚弱量表(CFS)明确测量。我们将虚弱定义为 CFS 5-8。主要结局为 30 天死亡率。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来调整已知混杂因素。我们还比较了虚弱与全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)标准的预后准确性。
我们共纳入 203 例患者,其中 117 例(57.6%)为虚弱患者。虚弱患者更有可能发生感染性休克(调整后优势比 [aOR],1.83;95%置信区间 [CI],1.08-2.51),更有可能在 ED 就诊后 30 天内死亡(aOR 2.05;95% CI,1.02-5.24)。CFS 对死亡率的敏感性最高(73.1%;95% CI,52.2-88.4),高于 SIRS≥2(65.4%;95% CI,44.3-82.8)或 qSOFA≥2(38.4%;95% CI,20.2-59.4)。
虚弱是一种高度普遍的预后因素,可用于对老年 ED 疑似感染患者进行风险分层。ED 临床医生应考虑筛查虚弱,以优化该人群的处置。