Department of Earth System Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
The Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, University College London, London, UK.
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):577-587. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0896-8. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
Countries have sought to stop the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by severely restricting travel and in-person commercial activities. Here, we analyse the supply-chain effects of a set of idealized lockdown scenarios, using the latest global trade modelling framework. We find that supply-chain losses that are related to initial COVID-19 lockdowns are largely dependent on the number of countries imposing restrictions and that losses are more sensitive to the duration of a lockdown than its strictness. However, a longer containment that can eradicate the disease imposes a smaller loss than shorter ones. Earlier, stricter and shorter lockdowns can minimize overall losses. A 'go-slow' approach to lifting restrictions may reduce overall damages if it avoids the need for further lockdowns. Regardless of the strategy, the complexity of global supply chains will magnify losses beyond the direct effects of COVID-19. Thus, pandemic control is a public good that requires collective efforts and support to lower-capacity countries.
各国通过严格限制旅行和面对面的商业活动来阻止 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的传播。在这里,我们使用最新的全球贸易建模框架来分析一系列理想化的封锁场景对供应链的影响。我们发现,与最初的 COVID-19 封锁相关的供应链损失在很大程度上取决于实施限制的国家数量,而且损失对封锁持续时间的敏感性大于其严格性。然而,能够消灭疾病的更长时间的遏制措施造成的损失比短期遏制措施造成的损失小。更早、更严格和更短的封锁可以将总损失降到最低。如果缓慢放松限制的方法避免了进一步封锁的需要,那么它可能会减少整体损失。无论采用哪种策略,如果不考虑全球供应链的复杂性,那么这种复杂性将使 COVID-19 的直接影响之外的损失进一步扩大。因此,大流行控制是一种公共产品,需要集体努力和支持来帮助能力较低的国家。