Suppr超能文献

缺血后:侵入性生理学是慢性冠状动脉综合征中心肌血运重建的唯一剩余把关者吗?

After ISCHEMIA: is invasive physiology the only remaining gatekeeper for myocardial revascularization in chronic coronary syndromes?

作者信息

Kanoun Sadeek, Toth Gabor G

机构信息

Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Rd, Exeter, EX2 5DW, Devon, UK.

University Heart Center Graz, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Herz. 2020 Aug;45(5):453-457. doi: 10.1007/s00059-020-04945-9.

Abstract

The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical And Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) has the potential to be a game changer in terms of the diagnostic and management approach to patients presenting with chronic coronary syndrome, suggesting that coronary revascularization may become almost like a "bail-out" strategy in the treatment of these patients. However, invasive perfusion assessment as a means of detecting the source of myocardial ischaemia at a lesion level, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR), has been validated in the past and established beyond doubt as a key diagnostic tool. The complementary role of the two approaches will be discussed here.

摘要

国际医学与侵入性方法比较健康效果研究(ISCHEMIA)有可能改变慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的诊断和管理方法,这表明冠状动脉血运重建在治疗这些患者时可能几乎成为一种“补救”策略。然而,侵入性灌注评估作为在病变水平检测心肌缺血来源的一种手段,如血流储备分数(FFR),过去已经得到验证,并且毫无疑问地成为一种关键的诊断工具。本文将讨论这两种方法的互补作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验