Kanoun Sadeek, Toth Gabor G
Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Rd, Exeter, EX2 5DW, Devon, UK.
University Heart Center Graz, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Herz. 2020 Aug;45(5):453-457. doi: 10.1007/s00059-020-04945-9.
The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical And Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) has the potential to be a game changer in terms of the diagnostic and management approach to patients presenting with chronic coronary syndrome, suggesting that coronary revascularization may become almost like a "bail-out" strategy in the treatment of these patients. However, invasive perfusion assessment as a means of detecting the source of myocardial ischaemia at a lesion level, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR), has been validated in the past and established beyond doubt as a key diagnostic tool. The complementary role of the two approaches will be discussed here.
国际医学与侵入性方法比较健康效果研究(ISCHEMIA)有可能改变慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的诊断和管理方法,这表明冠状动脉血运重建在治疗这些患者时可能几乎成为一种“补救”策略。然而,侵入性灌注评估作为在病变水平检测心肌缺血来源的一种手段,如血流储备分数(FFR),过去已经得到验证,并且毫无疑问地成为一种关键的诊断工具。本文将讨论这两种方法的互补作用。