Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉左侧远端入路:安全吗?

Left Distal Radial Artery Access Site in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is It Safe?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey

出版信息

Balkan Med J. 2020 Aug 11;37(5):276-280. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2020.2020.4.49. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left distal radial artery access site has emerged as a new technique for coronary angiography procedures.

AIMS

We aimed at assessing its applicability as an alternative way for primary percutaneous coronary interventions in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

METHODS

Left distal radial artery was used as an access site in 30 consecutive ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients for primary coronary intervention. It was used by experienced operators who were unaware of the study. All patients had a prominent pulse in their left forearm and distal radial artery. Each patient’s left arm was gently bent into his/her right groin with comfortable position of the hand. The operator/s stood at the right side of the patient where both could make the arterial puncture. Demographic features and complications were recorded during the hospital stay.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 58 years with a male gender predominance of 87%. Fifteen patients were diagnosed of Inferior elevation myocardial infarction, 14 patients of Anterior, and one of Lateral elevation myocardial infarction. The most common culprit artery was the left anterior descending coronary artery (14 patients). Six patients were in KILLIP class II on admission and only one with Anterior elevation myocardial infarction was in severe pulmonary edema (KILLIP III) during intervention. All the procedures were successfully contemplated with 6 French Judkins catheters. Brachial spasm occurred in one patient which was resolved with intra-arterial nitrate. Transfemoral approach was changed to left distal radial access in 4 patients due to severe bilateral iliac artery disease. Mean puncture time was 37.36 seconds. There was no radial occlusion, hematoma, hand neurologic deficit or bleeding. Patients were discharged on an average duration of 4.2 days.

CONCLUSION

Left distal radial artery can be used as an alternative safe and feasible access site for successful primary coronary interventions provided that it is performed by experienced operators.

摘要

背景

经左侧远端桡动脉入路已成为一种新的冠状动脉造影技术。

目的

旨在评估其作为 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的一种替代方法的适用性。

研究设计

回顾性观察性队列研究。

方法

在 30 例连续的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,经左侧远端桡动脉作为经皮冠状动脉介入的入路。该技术由经验丰富的操作者使用,而这些操作者并不知道这项研究。所有患者的左前臂和远端桡动脉都有明显的脉搏。每位患者的左臂轻柔地弯曲到右侧腹股沟,手的位置舒适。操作者站在患者的右侧,以便双方都可以进行动脉穿刺。记录患者住院期间的人口统计学特征和并发症。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 58 岁,男性占 87%。15 例患者诊断为下壁抬高型心肌梗死,14 例患者为前壁抬高型心肌梗死,1 例为侧壁抬高型心肌梗死。最常见的罪犯血管是左前降支冠状动脉(14 例)。6 例患者入院时为 KILLIP II 级,仅有 1 例前壁抬高型心肌梗死患者在介入治疗期间发生严重肺水肿(KILLIP III 级)。所有患者均成功地使用 6F 指引导管进行了介入治疗。1 例患者出现肱动脉痉挛,用动脉内硝酸酯类药物治疗后得到缓解。4 例患者因严重双侧髂动脉疾病而将经股动脉入路改为左侧远端桡动脉入路。平均穿刺时间为 37.36 秒。无桡动脉闭塞、血肿、手部神经功能缺损或出血。患者平均出院时间为 4.2 天。

结论

如果由经验丰富的操作者进行操作,左侧远端桡动脉可作为一种安全可行的替代入路,用于成功进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5671/7424190/b43f6302444c/BMJ-37-276-g3.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验