Considering Factors in the Single- Versus Dual-coil Lead Debate.
作者信息
Tondo Claudio
机构信息
Heart Rhythm Center at Monzino Cardiac Centre, IRCCS Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
出版信息
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018 Oct 15;9(10):3357-3358. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2018.091008. eCollection 2018 Oct.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Considering Factors in the Single- Versus Dual-coil Lead Debate.单线圈与双线圈导线之争中的考量因素
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018 Oct 15;9(10):3357-3358. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2018.091008. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Laser lead extraction allows for safe and effective removal of single- and dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: A single-centre experience over 12 years.激光导线拔除术可安全有效地移除单线圈和双线圈植入式心脏复律除颤器导线：一项为期12年的单中心经验。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;24(1):77-81. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw298. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Utilization trends and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with a single- vs a dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: Insights from the ALTITUDE Study.在植入单线圈与双线圈植入式心律转复除颤器导线的患者中，利用趋势和临床结局：来自 ALTITUDE 研究的见解。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Aug;12(8):1770-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.030. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
4
Effectiveness and safety of transvenous extraction of single- versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads at single-center experience.单中心经验：经静脉取出单线圈与双线圈植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的有效性和安全性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16548. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016548.
5
Single-coil and dual-coil defibrillator leads and association with clinical outcomes in a complete Danish nationwide ICD cohort.单线圈和双线圈除颤器导联与丹麦全国 ICD 队列临床结局的相关性。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Mar;13(3):706-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.11.034. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
6
Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.双线圈与单线圈植入式除颤器导线：文献回顾。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Apr;101(4):239-45. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0407-z. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
7
Comparison of Single-Coil and Dual-Coil Implantable Defibrillators: A Meta-Analysis.单线圈和双线圈植入式除颤器的比较：一项荟萃分析。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;3(1):12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
8
Contemporary rates and outcomes of single- vs. dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead implantation: data from the Israeli ICD Registry.当代单线圈与双线圈植入式心律转复除颤器导线植入的比率与结果：来自以色列 ICD 登记处的数据。
Europace. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):1485-1492. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw199.
9
Temporal Trends in and Factors Associated With Use of Single- Versus Dual-Coil Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads: Data From the NCDR ICD Registry.单双线圈植入式心律转复除颤器导线使用的时间趋势及相关因素：来自 NCDR ICD 注册中心的数据。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Jun;3(6):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.11.014. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
Multicentre comparison Of shock efficacy using single-vs. Dual-coil lead systems and Anodal vs. cathodaL polarITY defibrillation in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The MODALITY study.经静脉植入式心脏转复除颤器患者中使用单线圈与双线圈导线系统以及阳极与阴极极性除颤的电击疗效多中心比较。MODALITY研究。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;43(1):45-54. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-9980-9. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
本文引用的文献
1
Ineffective Shock Deliveries in a Patient with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Shock Vector Matters.缺血性心肌病患者无效电击除颤：电击向量很重要。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018 Oct 15;9(10):3355-3356. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2018.091007. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Comparison of Single-Coil and Dual-Coil Implantable Defibrillators: A Meta-Analysis.单线圈和双线圈植入式除颤器的比较：一项荟萃分析。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;3(1):12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
3
Temporal Trends in and Factors Associated With Use of Single- Versus Dual-Coil Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads: Data From the NCDR ICD Registry.单双线圈植入式心律转复除颤器导线使用的时间趋势及相关因素：来自 NCDR ICD 注册中心的数据。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Jun;3(6):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.11.014. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
4
Comparison of single-coil lead versus dual-coil lead of implantable cardioverter defibrillator on lead-related venous complications in a canine model.犬模型中植入式心脏复律除颤器单线圈导线与双线圈导线在导线相关静脉并发症方面的比较。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jul;52(2):195-201. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0312-8. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Comparison of Inappropriate Shocks and Other Health Outcomes Between Single- and Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: Results From the Cardiovascular Research Network Longitudinal Study of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.比较单腔和双腔植入式心脏复律除颤器在预防心源性猝死中的不适当电击和其他健康结局：心血管研究网络植入式心脏复律除颤器纵向研究的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 9;6(11):e006937. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006937.
6
A prospective randomized trial of single- or dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to minimize inappropriate shock risk in primary sudden cardiac death prevention.前瞻性随机试验比较单腔和双腔植入式心脏复律除颤器，以降低一级预防心源性猝死时不必要电击的风险。
Europace. 2014 Oct;16(10):1460-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu022. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
7
Inappropriate shocks in patients with ICDs: single chamber versus dual chamber.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的不适当电击：单腔与双腔。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Aug;101(2):141-8. doi: 10.5935/abc.20130125. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
8
Association of single- vs dual-chamber ICDs with mortality, readmissions, and complications among patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention.单腔与双腔 ICD 治疗用于一级预防的 ICD 患者的死亡率、再入院率和并发症的相关性。
JAMA. 2013 May 15;309(19):2025-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4982.
9
Superior vena cava defibrillator coils make transvenous lead extraction more challenging and riskier.上腔静脉除颤线圈使经静脉导线拔除更具挑战性且风险更高。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 5;61(9):987-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.014.
Zotero 插件