Health Economics Department, Neuroeconomix, Bogota, Colombia.
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Aug;21(4):821-827. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1779063. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
To estimate the cost-effectiveness of sequences starting with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), afatinib and osimertinib, for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (Exon 19 deletion or L858R) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stages IIIB - IV in Colombia.
A partitioned survival model was designed, using information from global and progression-free survival curves. For first and second-generation TKI, second line treatment was assumed according to the presence of T790M mutation to define the use of osimertinib or chemotherapy. The cost of the states without progression and post-progression was estimated using the base case approach, identified through consultation with clinical experts.
The cost of treatment starting with afatinib in the first line was of 222,247 USD (1 USD = 3171.99 COP) and produced 1.36 QALYs. The strategy with afatinib was dominant with respect to that of first line TKI (227,289 USD and 1.34 QALY). The strategy with osimertinib resulted in more QALYs and higher costs, with ICERs of 35,062 USD, exceeding the current willingness to pay threshold for Colombia.
Treatment starting with afatinib in the first line is dominant with respect to the strategy with first line TKI. The ICER of osimertinib sequence exceeds the threshold when compared with afatinib one.
评估以酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)、阿法替尼和奥希替尼为起始治疗方案治疗哥伦比亚ⅢB-IV 期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性(外显子 19 缺失或 L858R)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的成本效益。
设计了一个分区生存模型,使用来自全球和无进展生存曲线的信息。对于第一代和第二代 TKI,根据 T790M 突变的存在假设二线治疗,以确定使用奥希替尼或化疗。使用基于案例的方法估计无进展和进展后状态的成本,通过与临床专家协商确定。
一线起始使用阿法替尼的治疗费用为 222,247 美元(1 美元=3171.99 哥伦比亚比索),产生 1.36 QALYs。与一线 TKI 相比,阿法替尼策略具有优势(227,289 美元和 1.34 QALY)。奥希替尼策略导致更多的 QALYs 和更高的成本,其增量成本效益比为 35,062 美元,超过了哥伦比亚目前的支付意愿阈值。
一线起始使用阿法替尼的治疗方案相对于一线 TKI 策略具有优势。与阿法替尼相比,奥希替尼序列的增量成本效益比超过了阈值。