• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜碎石术、软性输尿管镜碎石术和体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾下极结石的临床和成本效益:肾下极结石随机对照试验(PUrE RCT)方案。

The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.

机构信息

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.

Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Jun 4;21(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04326-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04326-x
PMID:32498699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7273687/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Renal stones are common, with a lifetime prevalence of 10% in adults. Global incidence is increasing due to increases in obesity and diabetes, with these patient populations being more likely to suffer renal stone disease. Flank pain from stones (renal colic) is the most common cause of emergency admission to UK urology departments. Stones most commonly develop in the lower pole of the kidney (in ~35% of cases) and here are least likely to pass without intervention. Currently there are three technologies available within the UK National Health Service to remove lower pole kidney stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) with laser lithotripsy. Current evidence indicates there is uncertainty regarding the management of lower pole stones, and each treatment has advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this trial is to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of FURS compared with ESWL or PCNL in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones.

METHODS

The PUrE (PCNL, FURS and ESWL for lower pole kidney stones) trial is a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating FURS versus ESWL or PCNL for lower pole kidney stones. Patients aged ≥16 years with a stone(s) in the lower pole of either kidney confirmed by non-contrast computed tomography of the kidney, ureter and bladder (CTKUB) and requiring treatment for a stone ≤10 mm will be randomised to receive FURS or ESWL (RCT1), and those requiring treatment for a stone >10 mm to ≤25 mm will be randomised to receive FURS or PCNL (RCT2). Participants will undergo follow-up by questionnaires every week up to 12 weeks post-intervention and at 12 months post-randomisation. The primary clinical outcome is health status measured by the area under the curve calculated from multiple measurements of the EuroQol five dimensions five-level version (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire up to 12 weeks post-intervention. The primary economic outcome is the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained at 12 months post-randomisation.

DISCUSSION

The PUrE trial aims to provide robust evidence on health status, quality of life, clinical outcomes and resource use to directly inform choice and National Health Service provision of the three treatment options.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN: ISRCTN98970319. Registered on 11 November 2015.

摘要

介绍

肾结石很常见,成年人一生中的患病率为 10%。由于肥胖症和糖尿病的发病率上升,全球发病率正在上升,这些患者群体更有可能患上肾结石病。结石引起的侧腹痛(肾绞痛)是英国泌尿科部门急诊入院的最常见原因。结石最常发生在肾脏的下极(约 35%的病例),在这里不经干预最不可能通过。目前,英国国民保健制度中有三种技术可用于去除下极肾结石:体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)、经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)和输尿管软镜碎石术(FURS)联合激光碎石术。目前的证据表明,在下极结石的治疗方面存在不确定性,每种治疗方法都有其优点和缺点。本试验旨在确定 FURS 与 ESWL 或 PCNL 治疗下极肾结石的临床和成本效益。

方法

PURE(PCNL、FURS 和 ESWL 治疗下极肾结石)试验是一项多中心、随机对照试验(RCT),评估 FURS 与 ESWL 或 PCNL 在下极肾结石中的治疗效果。年龄≥16 岁的患者,通过非增强 CT 尿路成像(CTKUB)证实单侧或双侧肾脏的下极有结石,且需要治疗的结石直径≤10mm,将被随机分配接受 FURS 或 ESWL(RCT1),需要治疗的结石直径>10mm 且≤25mm 的患者将被随机分配接受 FURS 或 PCNL(RCT2)。参与者将在干预后 12 周内每周通过问卷调查进行随访,并在随机分组后 12 个月进行随访。主要临床结局是通过多次测量欧洲五维健康量表 5 级版(EQ-5D-5L)问卷计算的曲线下面积来衡量的健康状况,随访时间截至干预后 12 周。主要经济结局是随机分组后 12 个月时每获得一个质量调整生命年的增量成本。

讨论

PURE 试验旨在提供关于健康状况、生活质量、临床结果和资源利用的有力证据,直接为三种治疗选择的选择和国家卫生服务提供提供信息。

试验注册

ISRCTN:ISRCTN98970319。于 2015 年 11 月 11 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5711/7273687/98f13a71337d/13063_2020_4326_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5711/7273687/746e3c5baa04/13063_2020_4326_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5711/7273687/3f31d331f4c3/13063_2020_4326_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5711/7273687/98f13a71337d/13063_2020_4326_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5711/7273687/746e3c5baa04/13063_2020_4326_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5711/7273687/3f31d331f4c3/13063_2020_4326_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5711/7273687/98f13a71337d/13063_2020_4326_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.经皮肾镜碎石术、软性输尿管镜碎石术和体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾下极结石的临床和成本效益:肾下极结石随机对照试验(PUrE RCT)方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 4;21(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04326-x.
2
The PUrE randomised controlled trial 1: Clinical and cost effectiveness of flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole stones of ≤10 mm.纯随机对照试验1:软性输尿管肾镜检查和体外冲击波碎石术治疗直径≤10毫米的下极结石的临床疗效和成本效益
Eur Urol. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.002.
3
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).10 - 20毫米下极结石最佳治疗方法的荟萃分析:可弯曲输尿管镜检查(FURS)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对比经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25.
4
Flexible ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of lower pole renal hard stones ≤ 2 cm: a prospective randomized study.软性输尿管镜检查、体外冲击波碎石术及微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径≤2 cm的下极肾铸形结石:一项前瞻性随机研究
BMC Urol. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01644-z.
5
Shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopic stone treatment for adults with ureteric stones: the TISU non-inferiority RCT.冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗成人输尿管结石的比较:TISU 非劣效 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Mar;26(19):1-70. doi: 10.3310/WUZW9042.
6
Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.首次体外冲击波碎石术是治疗直径10至20毫米的下极肾结石的一种有效且具有成本效益的方法:一项大型单中心研究。
J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):510-516. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0825. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
7
TISU: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, as first treatment option, compared with direct progression to ureteroscopic treatment, for ureteric stones: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.TISU:体外冲击波碎石术作为输尿管结石的首选治疗方案与直接进行输尿管镜治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 May 22;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2652-1.
8
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for high-density, renal stones: a prospective, randomised trial.经皮肾镜碎石术是治疗高密度肾结石的一种安全替代体外冲击波碎石术的方法:一项前瞻性、随机试验。
BJU Int. 2021 Dec;128(6):744-751. doi: 10.1111/bju.15493. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
9
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.
10
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones.体外冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术及软性输尿管肾镜治疗下极结石的比较
Arab J Urol. 2012 Sep;10(3):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole stones: the PUrE RCTs.经皮肾镜取石术、软性输尿管肾镜检查和体外冲击波碎石术治疗下极结石的临床疗效及成本效益:PUrE随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(40):1-186. doi: 10.3310/WFRE6844.
2
Machine learning models to predict the zero-fragment rate and lower pole access with FANS during flexible Ureteroscopy-an EAU section of endourology study.用于预测软性输尿管镜检查期间采用FANS的零碎片率和下极入路的机器学习模型——欧洲泌尿外科学会腔内泌尿外科研究部分
World J Urol. 2025 Jul 6;43(1):412. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05798-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative exploration of the renal stone patients' experience and development of the renal stone-specific patient-reported outcome measure.定性探讨肾结石患者的体验以及肾结石患者报告结局测量量表的开发。
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):123-132. doi: 10.1111/bju.14873. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.系统评价和冲击波碎石术、逆行性肾内手术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾结石的临床疗效的荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.054. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
3
[Stones in the lower pole and their treatment].
[下极结石及其治疗]
Urologie. 2025 Jul;64(7):715-724. doi: 10.1007/s00120-025-02577-7. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
4
Increased efficacy in lower pole stone management with a novel flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a case series.新型可弯曲且可导航的输尿管吸引鞘联合可弯曲输尿管镜碎石术治疗下极结石的疗效增强:病例系列研究
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):158-165. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-388. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
5
Ureteroscopy and lasertripsy for lower pole stones <2 cm, in situ vs displacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis.输尿管镜检查及激光碎石术治疗直径<2 cm的下极结石:原位治疗与移位治疗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):399-407. doi: 10.1111/bju.16534. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
6
Effect of infundibulopelvic angle on outcomes of ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.漏斗骨盆角对输尿管镜手术结果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Jul 16;42(1):413. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05104-z.
7
Undertaking Studies Within A Trial to evaluate recruitment and retention strategies for randomised controlled trials: lessons learnt from the PROMETHEUS research programme.在一项评估随机对照试验招募和保留策略的试验中进行研究:从 PROMETHEUS 研究计划中吸取的经验教训。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(2):1-114. doi: 10.3310/HTQW3107.
8
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
9
Flexible ureteroscopy for lower pole calculus: is it still a challenge?软性输尿管镜治疗下极结石:是否仍然具有挑战性?
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):3345-3353. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04606-6. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
10
The feasibility of ultrasound-guided mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for ESWL-resistant lower calyx renal stones of up to two centimeters: a single center experience.超声引导下微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗 ESWL 抵抗性 2cm 以下下盏肾结石的可行性:单中心经验。
J Med Life. 2023 Apr;16(4):520-525. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0036.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.
4
A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管肾镜术治疗直径≤2 cm下盏结石的前瞻性随机对照研究:单中心经验
J Endourol. 2015 May;29(5):575-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0473. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
5
Use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to calculate the impact of obesity and diabetes on cost and prevalence of urolithiasis in 2030.利用国家健康与营养检查调查来计算2030年肥胖症和糖尿病对尿石症成本及患病率的影响。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):724-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.036. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
6
Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes.逆行肾内手术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗中等大小下极结石:客观和主观结局的前瞻性评估。
Urology. 2014 May;83(5):1016-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.026. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
7
Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.比较冲击波碎石术和软性输尿管肾镜术治疗小于1厘米的下极结石的前瞻性随机试验。
Urolithiasis. 2014 Apr;42(2):127-31. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0618-z. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
8
Stones in 2012: epidemiology, prevention and redefining therapeutic standards.2012年的结石:流行病学、预防及治疗标准的重新定义
Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Feb;10(2):75-7. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.253. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
9
State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--3.状态转移建模:ISPOR-SMDM 建模良好实践工作组的报告——3。
Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):812-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.014.
10
Trends in urological stone disease.泌尿系统结石病的趋势。
BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109(7):1082-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10495.x. Epub 2011 Aug 26.