Suppr超能文献

一项关于罗米司亭治疗实体瘤和血液系统恶性肿瘤化疗所致血小板减少症的多中心研究。

A multicenter study of romiplostim for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.

机构信息

Div of Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

Hematology Division, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Haematologica. 2021 Apr 1;106(4):1148-1157. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.251900.

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) frequently complicates cancer treatment causing chemotherapy delays, dose reductions, and discontinuation. There is no FDA-approved agent available to manage CIT. This study retrospectively evaluated patients with CIT treated on institutional romiplostim treatment pathways at 4 U.S. centers. The primary outcome was achievement of a romiplostim response [median on-romiplostim platelet count (Plt) ≥75x109/L and ≥30x109/L above baseline]. Secondary outcomes included time to Plt≥100x109/L and rates of the following: Plt<100x109/L, Plt<75x109/L, Plt<50x109/L, thrombocytosis, chemotherapy dose reduction/treatment delay, platelet transfusion, bleeding, and thromboembolism. Multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of romiplostim non-response and compare weekly dosing with intracycle/intermittent dosing. 173 patients (153 solid tumor, 20 lymphoma or myeloma) were treated, with 170 (98%) receiving a median of 4 (range, 1-36) additional chemotherapy cycles on romiplostim. Romiplostim was effective in solid tumor patients: 71% of patients achieved a romiplostim response, 79% avoided chemotherapy dose reductions/treatment delays and 89% avoided platelet transfusions. Median per-patient Plt on romiplostim was significantly higher than baseline (116x109/L vs. 60x109/L, P<0.001). Bone marrow tumor invasion, prior pelvic irradiation, and prior temozolomide predicted romiplostim non-response. Bleeding rates were lower than historical CIT cohorts and thrombosis rates were not elevated. Weekly dosing was superior to intracycle dosing with higher response rates and less chemotherapy dose reductions/treatment delays (IRR 3.00, 95% CI 1.30-6.91, P=0.010) or bleeding (IRR 4.84, 95% CI 1.18-19.89, P=0.029). Blunted response (10% response rate) was seen in non-myeloid hematologic malignancy patients with bone marrow involvement. In conclusion, romiplostim was safe and effective for CIT in most solid tumor patients.

摘要

化疗诱导的血小板减少症(CIT)常使癌症治疗复杂化,导致化疗延迟、剂量减少和停药。目前还没有获得 FDA 批准的药物来治疗 CIT。本研究回顾性评估了在美国 4 个中心接受机构 romiplostim 治疗方案治疗的 CIT 患者。主要结局是 romiplostim 应答的实现[中位数 romiplostim 治疗后血小板计数(Plt)≥75x109/L,比基线水平升高≥30x109/L]。次要结局包括达到 Plt≥100x109/L 的时间以及以下情况的发生率:Plt<100x109/L、Plt<75x109/L、Plt<50x109/L、血小板增多症、化疗剂量减少/治疗延迟、血小板输注、出血和血栓栓塞。多变量回归用于确定 romiplostim 无应答的预测因素,并比较每周剂量与周期内/间歇剂量。173 名患者(153 名实体瘤患者,20 名淋巴瘤或骨髓瘤患者)接受了治疗,其中 170 名(98%)患者在 romiplostim 治疗期间接受了中位数为 4(范围,1-36)个额外的化疗周期。在实体瘤患者中,romiplostim 有效:71%的患者达到 romiplostim 应答,79%避免了化疗剂量减少/治疗延迟,89%避免了血小板输注。romiplostim 治疗后每名患者的 Plt 中位数显著高于基线水平(116x109/L 比 60x109/L,P<0.001)。骨髓肿瘤浸润、盆腔放疗史和替莫唑胺治疗史预测 romiplostim 无应答。出血率低于 CIT 历史队列,血栓形成率未升高。与周期内剂量相比,每周剂量具有更高的反应率和更少的化疗剂量减少/治疗延迟(IRR 3.00,95%CI 1.30-6.91,P=0.010)或出血(IRR 4.84,95%CI 1.18-19.89,P=0.029)。骨髓受累的非髓性血液恶性肿瘤患者出现反应迟钝(10%的反应率)。总之,romiplostim 对大多数实体瘤患者的 CIT 是安全有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99db/8018116/e8cf2bfac997/1061148.fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验