Department of Communication Sciences, Humanities and International Studies, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Urbino, Italy.
Brain and Behavioral Sciences Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Apr;33(4):1005-1013. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01604-1. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
Updating is a crucial function responsible of working memory integrity, allowing relevant information to be active and inhibiting irrelevant one; updating has been studied mainly with verbal stimuli, less with faces, stimuli with high adaptive value and social meaning.
Our aim was to test age-related differences in updating for different stimuli in three different age groups: young adults (range 20-30 years), young-old (range 60-75 years) and older-old participants (range 77-87 years).
To this end, we administered control measures (i.e., vocabulary and visuospatial tasks), span tasks (forward, backward) and two updating tasks: one with no socially relevant material (i.e., letters) and another one with socially relevant material (i.e., human faces, where, in particular, the combination between facial expression and gaze direction was manipulated). In both tasks we collected response times (RTs) at different steps of an updating task (i.e., encoding, maintaining, and updating goal-relevant information).
We found that age linearly produces an increase in processing speed regardless the stimulus considered, either letter or human face. However, with face stimuli, the magnitude of the difference is greater for the letter updating task, than for the face updating task. In turn, the results claim for a stimulus-specific updating process as the age-related decline is less pronounced when socially meaningful stimuli are involved than when no socially meaningful ones are.
更新是负责工作记忆完整性的关键功能,使相关信息保持活跃并抑制不相关信息;更新主要使用言语刺激进行研究,较少使用面孔刺激,而面孔刺激具有较高的适应价值和社会意义。
我们的目的是在三个不同年龄组(年轻人组[20-30 岁]、年轻老年人组[60-75 岁]和老年人组[77-87 岁])中测试不同刺激的更新与年龄相关的差异。
为此,我们进行了控制措施(即词汇和视空间任务)、跨度任务(前向、后向)和两个更新任务:一个没有社会相关材料(即字母),另一个有社会相关材料(即人脸,特别是表情和注视方向的组合被操纵)。在这两个任务中,我们收集了更新任务不同步骤的反应时间(RT)(即编码、保持和更新目标相关信息)。
我们发现,无论考虑的是字母还是人脸刺激,年龄都会线性地导致处理速度的提高。然而,对于人脸刺激,与字母更新任务相比,字母更新任务的差异幅度更大。反过来,结果表明更新过程具有刺激特异性,因为当涉及到有意义的社会刺激时,与没有有意义的社会刺激相比,与年龄相关的下降不那么明显。