In-hospital outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with and without prior coronary artery bypass graft: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

The clinical outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in prior coronary artery bypass graft (pCABG) patients have been investigated; however, the results are inconsistent.The present meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes of CTO PCI in patients with and without prior CABG (nCABG). The endpoints included technical success, procedural success, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), major bleeding, coronary perforation, pericardial tamponade, emergency CABG, and vascular access complication.A total of 7 studies comprising of 11099 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that compared to nCABG patents, pCABG patients were associated with lower technical success (82.3% versus 87.8%; OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53-0.68; P < .00001; I = 0%) and procedural success (80.4% versus 86.2%; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.53-0.70; P < .00001; I = 10%); a higher risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.56-5.57; P = 0.0008; I = 0%), MI (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.40-3.80; P = .001; I = 5%), and coronary perforation (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.51-3.08; P < 0.0001; I = 52%). On the other hand, the risk of pericardial tamponade (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.15-1.18; P = .10; I = 21%), major bleeding (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.90-2.53; P = .11; I = 0%), vascular access complication (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.93-2.41; P = .10; I = 0%), and emergency CABG (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.25-3.91; P = .99; I = 0%) was similar in both groups.Compared to nCABG patients, pCABG patients had lower CTO PCI success rates, higher rates of in-hospital mortality, MI, and coronary perforation, and similar risk of pericardial tamponade and vascular complication rates.