Suppr超能文献

术前化疗后乳腺癌的辅助化疗:倾向评分匹配分析。

Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: A propensity score matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

Translational Research Department, Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0234173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234173. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Although identified to be at a higher risk of relapse, no consensus exists on the treatment of breast cancer (BC) patients with no pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) in this context has scarcely been studied. We evaluated the benefit of administrating adjuvant chemotherapy in a real life cohort of BC patients with invasive residual disease after NAC. 1199 female BC patients with T1-3NxM0 invasive tumors receiving NAC at Institut Curie from 2002 to 2012 were included in the analysis. 1061 had been treated by NAC only, whereas 138 had received additional adjuvant chemotherapy after NAC (FUN protocol: 5-FU-Vinorelbine). We compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates between patients having received NAC only and patients having received NAC+ADJ. To ensure comparability of our populations, we used a propensity score (which defines the probability of treatment assignment conditional on observed baseline covariates) and matched each patient having received NAC+ADJ (n = 138) with a patient having received NAC only that had a similar propensity score value. Before propensity score matching, DFS and OS rates were significantly lower in the NAC+ADJ group compared to NAC only, after 3 years, 5 years and 10 years follow-up (p<0.01). After one-to-one PS matching, the two groups were comparable (n = 276 patients; 138 patients in each group). No significant difference was found regarding DFS (p = 0.87) or OS (p = 0.59) rates, neither in global population, nor by pathological subtype. Although our study did not show a benefit of administrating ADJ with FUN protocol (5-Florouracil- Vinorelbine) to BC patients with residual disease after NAC, further studies are warranted to determine the impact of other adjuvant regimens. Thereby, patients with little chance of responding to particular regimens could avoid the toxicity of futile therapy, and be study participants in evaluations of novel treatment strategies.

摘要

尽管已经确定某些乳腺癌(BC)患者在接受新辅助化疗(NAC)后没有完全病理缓解,复发风险更高,但对于这些患者的治疗尚无共识。在这种情况下,辅助化疗(ADJ)的益处几乎没有得到研究。我们评估了在接受 NAC 后存在浸润性残留疾病的 BC 患者的真实队列中给予辅助化疗的益处。2002 年至 2012 年,在居里研究所接受 NAC 治疗的 1199 名 T1-3NxM0 浸润性肿瘤的女性 BC 患者被纳入分析。其中 1061 例仅接受 NAC 治疗,138 例在 NAC 后接受额外的辅助化疗(FUN 方案:5-FU-长春瑞滨)。我们比较了仅接受 NAC 治疗的患者和接受 NAC+ADJ 治疗的患者的无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)。为了确保我们的人群具有可比性,我们使用了倾向评分(定义了在观察到的基线协变量条件下治疗分配的概率),并将接受 NAC+ADJ 治疗的每位患者(n = 138)与接受 NAC 治疗且具有相似倾向评分值的患者进行匹配。在进行倾向评分匹配之前,在接受 NAC+ADJ 治疗的患者中,DFS 和 OS 率明显低于仅接受 NAC 治疗的患者,在 3 年、5 年和 10 年随访时(p<0.01)。在一对一 PS 匹配后,两组具有可比性(n = 276 例患者;每组 138 例患者)。在总人群和病理亚型中,DFS(p = 0.87)或 OS(p = 0.59)率均无显著差异。尽管我们的研究没有显示在 NAC 后存在残留疾病的 BC 患者中使用 FUN 方案(5-氟尿嘧啶-长春瑞滨)给予 ADJ 的益处,但需要进一步研究来确定其他辅助方案的影响。这样,对特定方案反应机会较小的患者可以避免无效治疗的毒性,并成为新型治疗策略评估的研究参与者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a523/7274443/df235f968939/pone.0234173.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验