Division of Soil and Water Management, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven-Heverlee, Belgium.
IZTA-Herbarium, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)-Faculty of Superior Studies Iztacala, Mexico.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 Sep;39(9):1826-1838. doi: 10.1002/etc.4795. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
The validity of soil toxicity databases for predicting ecological impacts in the field is rarely explored. The present study was set up to test whether laboratory toxicity data and the combined concepts of metal availability and mixture toxicity can predict ecological impact in mining-affected soils. Metal and As contamination gradients were sampled approximately 5 different mines in Mexico where plant cover and abundances exhibited clear dose-related responses. Soils were analyzed for total and isotopically exchangeable (labile) concentrations of Ni, Cu, Cd, Pb, and As and for soil properties affecting the availability of these elements. Six different indices of toxic doses were compared to evaluate their accuracy in describing the field response expressed as relative abundance and cover. Each index was based on a different method to calculate the sum of toxic units ( TUs) in soil, with 1 toxic unit equal to the concentration of the element in soil yielding 50% adverse effect on plants with median sensitivity as recorded in a recent database of salt-spiked soils. Toxic concentrations in the mine-impacted soils were dominated by Zn and As. In the field, 50% reduced cover or abundance was found at 10 to 13 TUs if these were based on total soil concentrations and thresholds derived from freshly spiked soils, indicating a largely overestimated toxic effect. If thresholds were corrected for differences in availability among freshly spiked soils and spiked and laboratory-aged soils, the overestimation of field toxicity was 5- to 6-fold, irrespective of the consideration of soil properties. Finally, the TU calculated only with labile metals and As overestimated the field toxicity by factors 1.1 to 1.6 (95% confidence interval 1-7; i.e., rather accurate and indicating some Zn-As antagonism as confirmed in experimental studies). That latter index of dose yielded a bell-shaped response on species richness peaking at approximately 1.6 TU. Overall, the present study shows that the current toxicity databases of metals can predict the impact of metal contamination on plant communities within factor 2, expressing the dose as soil-labile concentrations and using the concentration addition concept in these mixed polluted environments. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:1826-1838. © 2020 SETAC.
土壤毒性数据库预测野外生态影响的有效性很少被探究。本研究旨在测试实验室毒性数据以及金属有效性和混合物毒性的综合概念是否可以预测矿区土壤的生态影响。在墨西哥的大约 5 个不同矿区,沿着金属和砷污染梯度采集样本,其中植物盖度和丰度呈现出明显的剂量相关响应。分析土壤中镍、铜、镉、铅和砷的总浓度和同位素可交换(活性)浓度,以及影响这些元素有效性的土壤特性。比较了六种不同的毒性剂量指数,以评估它们在描述以相对丰度和盖度表示的野外响应方面的准确性。每个指数都基于计算土壤毒性单位总和的不同方法,其中一个毒性单位等于使具有中等敏感性的植物产生 50%不良效应的土壤中元素浓度,这是根据最近的盐喷溅土壤数据库记录的。矿区土壤中的毒性浓度主要由锌和砷主导。在野外,如果这些基于总土壤浓度和源自新喷溅土壤的阈值,则发现 50%的减少覆盖或丰度发生在 10 到 13 个毒性单位,如果考虑到新喷溅土壤和喷溅及实验室老化土壤之间的有效性差异,那么对野外毒性的高估则达到 5 到 6 倍,而不考虑土壤特性。最后,仅使用可利用金属和砷计算的毒性单位(95%置信区间为 1-7,即相当准确,并表明一些 Zn-As 拮抗作用,这在实验研究中得到了证实)高估了野外毒性 1.1 到 1.6 倍(即相当准确,并表明一些 Zn-As 拮抗作用,这在实验研究中得到了证实)。后者的剂量指数在物种丰富度上呈钟形响应,峰值约为 1.6 个毒性单位。总体而言,本研究表明,当前的金属毒性数据库可以在 2 倍的因子内预测金属污染对植物群落的影响,以土壤可利用浓度表示剂量,并在这些混合污染环境中使用浓度加和概念。