Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查后阑尾炎:当前证据的系统评价。

Post-colonoscopy appendicitis: Systematic review of current evidence.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, St John of God Midland Hospital, Midland, Western Australia, Australia.

School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Dec;35(12):2032-2040. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15130. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Appendicitis after colonoscopy is an exceedingly rare complication. It remains to be explored if this entity is truly a complication of colonoscopy or a coincidental occurrence of appendicitis post-colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to systematically review all the available evidence since it was first described in 1988.

METHODS

The literature on post-colonoscopy appendicitis was searched using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Additional manual search was performed and cross-checked for additional references. The search was performed up to November 2019. Data collected included demographics, reason for colonoscopy, time to diagnosis, imaging performed, management, and outcome.

RESULTS

Fifty-three cases were found in the systematic review with a median age of 55 years (24-84 years). The time to diagnosis post-colonoscopy was mostly within 24-48 h. Clinical features mimicked those of common acute appendicitis. In the past decade, computed tomography scan has been the imaging choice to investigate abdominal pain after colonoscopy, mainly to rule out perforation. The mainstay of management was appendectomy (open or laparoscopy). Four of the 12 cases (33.3%) were treated successfully with antibiotics alone. There has been a twofold increase in cases reported in the past decade (2009-2019, n = 31 vs 1999-2008, n = 15).

CONCLUSION

There is a considerable variation in the definition of post-colonoscopy appendicitis in the current literature. Regardless of whether post-colonoscopy appendicitis is a true entity, it should be considered as a differential diagnosis in any patient presenting with acute abdomen following colonoscopy.

摘要

背景与目的

结肠镜检查后阑尾炎是一种极为罕见的并发症。目前仍不清楚这种情况是结肠镜检查的真正并发症,还是结肠镜检查后阑尾炎的偶然发生。本研究旨在对自 1988 年首次描述以来的所有现有证据进行系统回顾。

方法

使用 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库检索有关结肠镜检查后阑尾炎的文献。还进行了额外的手动搜索,并对额外的参考文献进行了交叉检查。搜索截至 2019 年 11 月。收集的数据包括人口统计学资料、结肠镜检查的原因、诊断时间、进行的影像学检查、治疗方法和结果。

结果

系统评价中发现 53 例病例,中位年龄为 55 岁(24-84 岁)。结肠镜检查后诊断时间大多在 24-48 小时内。临床表现类似于常见的急性阑尾炎。在过去十年中,计算机断层扫描已成为检查结肠镜检查后腹痛的首选影像学检查方法,主要是为了排除穿孔。主要的治疗方法是阑尾切除术(开放或腹腔镜)。在过去十年中,有 12 例(33.3%)中有 4 例仅用抗生素治疗成功。在过去十年中,报告的病例数量增加了一倍(2009-2019 年,n=31 与 1999-2008 年,n=15)。

结论

目前文献中对结肠镜检查后阑尾炎的定义存在相当大的差异。无论结肠镜检查后阑尾炎是否是一个真正的实体,对于任何在结肠镜检查后出现急性腹痛的患者,都应将其视为鉴别诊断之一。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验