Suppr超能文献

靶向治疗炎症性肠病患者。有什么证据?

Treatment to target in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. What is the evidence?

机构信息

Department of Medical Gastrointestinal Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Medicinsk Gastroenterologi, Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 May;55(5):528-536. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1764091. Epub 2020 Jun 5.

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic, progressive diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Current therapy has not been able to change the long-term course of the disease, but treatment to a specific therapeutic target could be a game-changer. To assess the evidence of a treat to target (T2T) algorithm being superior to clinical management in the treatment of IBD, a systematic review of the literature is conducted. A comprehensive survey of PubMed and Embase covering the period April 2018 to July 2019 including articles referenced in relevant studies. Both randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies were included. To be eligible for inclusion, the studies had to describe or analyze the effects of T2T on remission and/or recurrence of disease in patients with IBD. Twenty-two studies were included in this review, seven RCTs, eight comparative and seven non-comparative observational studies. Large heterogeneity between T2T algorithms applied, type of IBD investigated and outcomes evaluated characterized the studies. The comprehensive search identified only 22 heterogeneous studies. Out of these, a total of 14 indicated a positive effect of a T2T algorithm. Out of the seven RCT studies, four indicated a positive effect. Thus, T2T algorithms may be superior to the clinical management of IBD. However, the evidence is sparse and inconsistent.

摘要

炎症性肠病(IBD)是一种慢性、进行性胃肠道疾病。目前的治疗方法还不能改变疾病的长期进程,但针对特定治疗靶点的治疗可能会改变游戏规则。为了评估针对特定治疗目标(T2T)的算法在治疗 IBD 方面优于临床管理的证据,我们进行了一项文献的系统综述。对 PubMed 和 Embase 进行了全面检索,涵盖了 2018 年 4 月至 2019 年 7 月的文献,并包括了相关研究中引用的文章。纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究。为了符合纳入标准,研究必须描述或分析 T2T 对 IBD 患者疾病缓解和/或复发的影响。本综述共纳入了 22 项研究,其中 7 项为 RCT,8 项为比较性研究,7 项为非比较性观察性研究。所应用的 T2T 算法、所研究的 IBD 类型和评估的结局之间存在很大的异质性,这是这些研究的特点。全面检索仅确定了 22 项具有异质性的研究。其中,共有 14 项研究表明 T2T 算法具有积极的效果。在 7 项 RCT 研究中,有 4 项表明 T2T 算法具有积极的效果。因此,T2T 算法可能优于 IBD 的临床管理。然而,证据稀少且不一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验