Suppr超能文献

社论评论:前交叉韧带重建的移植物选择:是否会有正确答案?可能没有。

Editorial Commentary: Graft Choice for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Will There Ever Be a Correct Answer? Probably Not.

机构信息

Sidney Kimmel College of Medicine at Thomas Jefferson University.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1647-1648. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.005.

Abstract

Graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been a great controversy in the sports medicine literature for the last 25 years. It has been well studied in the orthopaedic literature, with numerous randomized control trials and large database studies. There remain advantages and disadvantages to each autograft choice, primarily bone-patellar tendon-bone, quadrupled hamstring, as well as allograft. More recently, quadriceps autograft has also been studied as a suitable alternative. Most studies show nearly equivalent functional outcomes for autograft anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring autografts in athletes younger than the age of 25 years, whereas allograft may be preferred for older athletes.

摘要

在前交叉韧带重建中,移植物的选择一直是运动医学文献中的一个重大争议,在过去的 25 年中,它在骨科文献中得到了广泛研究,包括许多随机对照试验和大型数据库研究。每种自体移植物(主要是骨-髌腱-骨、四股腘绳肌和同种异体移植物)都有其优缺点。最近,股四头肌自体移植物也被研究作为一种合适的替代物。大多数研究表明,对于 25 岁以下的运动员,使用骨-髌腱-骨和腘绳肌自体移植物进行前交叉韧带重建的自体移植物具有几乎相同的功能结果,而同种异体移植物可能更适合年龄较大的运动员。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验