• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推文是否能提高被引频次?TSSMN 前瞻性随机试验一年结果。

Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, SUNY-Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jan;111(1):296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065
PMID:32504611
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network (TSSMN) is a collaborative effort of leading journals in cardiothoracic surgery to highlight publications via social media. This study aims to evaluate the 1-year results of a prospective randomized social media trial to determine the effect of tweeting on subsequent citations and nontraditional bibliometrics.

METHODS

A total of 112 representative original articles were randomized 1:1 to be tweeted via TSSMN or a control (non-tweeted) group. Measured endpoints included citations at 1 year compared with baseline, as well as article-level metrics (Altmetric score) and Twitter analytics. Independent predictors of citations were identified through univariable and multivariable regression analyses.

RESULTS

When compared with control articles, tweeted articles achieved significantly greater increase in Altmetric scores (Tweeted 9.4 ± 5.8 vs Non-tweeted 1.0 ± 1.8, P < .001), Altmetric score percentiles relative to articles of similar age from each respective journal (Tweeted 76.0 ± 9.1 percentile vs Non-tweeted 13.8 ± 22.7 percentile, P < .001), with greater change in citations at 1 year (Tweeted +3.1 ± 2.4 vs Non-Tweeted +0.7 ± 1.3, P < .001). Multivariable analysis showed that independent predictors of citations were randomization to tweeting (odds ratio [OR] 9.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.30-27.35, P < .001), Altmetric score (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.15-1.50, P < .001), open-access status (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.21-1.78, P < .001), and exposure to a larger number of Twitter followers as quantified by impressions (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.10-1.49, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

One-year follow-up of this TSSMN prospective randomized trial importantly demonstrates that tweeting results in significantly more article citations over time, highlighting the durable scholarly impact of social media activity.

摘要

背景

胸外科社交媒体网络(TSSMN)是心胸外科领域领先期刊的合作努力,旨在通过社交媒体突出发表的文章。本研究旨在评估一项前瞻性随机社交媒体试验的 1 年结果,以确定发推文对后续引文和非传统文献计量学的影响。

方法

共有 112 篇具有代表性的原始文章被随机分为 1:1 组,通过 TSSMN 或对照组(未发推文)进行推文。测量终点包括与基线相比 1 年内的引文,以及文章级别的指标(Altmetric 分数)和 Twitter 分析。通过单变量和多变量回归分析确定引文的独立预测因素。

结果

与对照组文章相比,发推文的文章的 Altmetric 分数显著增加(推文 9.4 ± 5.8 与非推文 1.0 ± 1.8,P <.001),相对于每个期刊中年龄相似的文章的 Altmetric 分数百分比(推文 76.0 ± 9.1 百分比与非推文 13.8 ± 22.7 百分比,P <.001),并且在 1 年内的引文变化更大(推文 +3.1 ± 2.4 与非推文 +0.7 ± 1.3,P <.001)。多变量分析表明,引文的独立预测因素是随机分组进行推文(比值比[OR] 9.50;95%置信区间[CI] 3.30-27.35,P <.001),Altmetric 分数(OR 1.32;95% CI 1.15-1.50,P <.001),开放获取状态(OR 1.56;95% CI 1.21-1.78,P <.001)以及通过印象量化的更多 Twitter 关注者的暴露(OR 1.30,95% CI 1.10-1.49,P <.001)。

结论

本 TSSMN 前瞻性随机试验的 1 年随访结果重要地表明,随着时间的推移,推文会导致文章引文显著增加,突出了社交媒体活动的持久学术影响力。

相似文献

1
Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial.推文是否能提高被引频次?TSSMN 前瞻性随机试验一年结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jan;111(1):296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
Social Media Improves Cardiothoracic Surgery Literature Dissemination: Results of a Randomized Trial.社交媒体改善心胸外科文献传播:一项随机试验的结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Feb;109(2):589-595. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.062. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network: Early experience and lessons learned.胸外科社交媒体网络:早期经验和教训。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Oct;158(4):1127-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.099. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
4
Longitudinal relationship between social media activity and article citations in the journal Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.社交媒体活动与《胃肠内镜学》杂志文章引用之间的纵向关系。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jul;90(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.028. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
5
The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network: Early Experience and Lessons Learned.胸外科社交媒体网络:早期经验与教训。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Oct;108(4):1248-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
6
Correlation Between Altmetric Score and Citations in Pediatric Surgery Core Journals.儿科外科核心期刊中 Altmetric 分数与引文的相关性。
J Surg Res. 2019 Nov;243:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 30.
7
Social Media and Academic Impact: Do Early Tweets Correlate with Future Citations?社交媒体与学术影响力:早期推文与未来引用是否相关?
Ear Nose Throat J. 2024 Feb;103(2):75-80. doi: 10.1177/01455613211042113. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
8
Analysis of highly tweeted dental journals and articles: a science mapping approach.高 tweeted 牙科期刊和文章分析:科学图谱方法。
Br Dent J. 2019 May;226(9):673-678. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0212-z.
9
Predictors of High-Impact Articles in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.《胸外科年鉴》高影响力文章的预测因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Dec;110(6):2096-2103. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.102. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
10
Twitter Mentions and Academic Citations in the Urologic Literature.泌尿学文献中的推特提及与学术引用
Urology. 2019 Jan;123:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.041. Epub 2018 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Scrolling surgeons: Assessment of social media and artificial intelligence usage in gynecologic oncology fellows and fellowship programs.忙碌的外科医生:妇科肿瘤学住院医师及住院医师培训项目中社交媒体和人工智能使用情况的评估
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Aug 18;61:101923. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101923. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Influence of Social Media on the Dissemination and Uptake of Cardiology Research.社交媒体对心脏病学研究传播与应用的影响
Cureus. 2025 Jun 21;17(6):e86509. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86509. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media.
社交媒体上学术自我推广中的性别差距。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):5552. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60590-y.
4
Improving cancer prevention and control through implementing academic-local public health department partnerships - protocol for a cluster-randomized implementation trial using a positive deviance approach.通过建立学术机构与地方公共卫生部门的伙伴关系来改善癌症预防与控制——一项采用积极偏差方法的整群随机实施试验方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Feb 24;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00706-z.
5
Letter to editor: A randomized controlled trial of social media promotion in neurosurgical publishing.给编辑的信:社交媒体推广在神经外科学术出版中的随机对照试验。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Sep 24;47(1):672. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02820-3.
6
Characteristics and Impact of Randomized Trials on Drugs or Devices in Cardiovascular Medicine.心血管医学中药物或器械随机试验的特点和影响。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Sep;24(5):651-661. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00670-4. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
7
A randomized controlled trial of social media promotion in neurosurgical publishing.社交媒体推广在神经外科学术出版中的随机对照试验。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jul 27;47(1):363. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02597-5.
8
Current insights on social media as a tool for the dissemination of research and education in surgery: a narrative review.社交媒体作为外科领域研究和教育传播工具的最新见解:叙事性综述。
Surg Today. 2024 Oct;54(10):1113-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02891-1. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
9
Cardiovascular Conferences and Social Media: Conference Tweeting as a Tool for Equity, Innovation, and Education.心血管会议与社交媒体:会议推文作为促进公平、创新和教育的工具
JACC Adv. 2023 Jul 27;2(6):100435. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100435. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Examining the Effectiveness of Social Media for the Dissemination of Research Evidence for Health and Social Care Practitioners: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.考察社交媒体在传播健康和社会保健从业者研究证据方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 5;26:e51418. doi: 10.2196/51418.