• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体上学术自我推广中的性别差距。

The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media.

作者信息

Peng Hao, Teplitskiy Misha, Romero Daniel M, Horvát Emőke-Ágnes

机构信息

Department of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):5552. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60590-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-60590-y
PMID:40593529
Abstract

Self-promotion in science is ubiquitous but may not be exercised equally by everyone. Research on self-promotion in other domains suggests that, partly due to adverse reactions to non-gender-conforming career-enhancing behaviors, women tend to self-promote less often than men. We test whether this pattern extends to online spaces by examining scholarly self-promotion over six years using 23M tweets about 2.8M research papers authored by 3.5M scientists. We find that, overall, women are about 28% less likely than men to self-promote their papers on Twitter (now X) despite accounting for important confounds. The differential adoption of Twitter does not fully explain the gender gap in self-promotion, which is large even in relatively gender-balanced research areas, where adversity is expected to be smaller. Moreover, we find that the gender gap increases with higher performance and academic status, being most pronounced for research-prolific women from top-ranked institutions who publish papers in high-impact journals. We also find differential returns with respect to gender: while self-promotion is associated with increased tweets of papers compared to no self-promotion, the increase is slightly smaller for women than for men. Our findings reveal that scholarly self-promotion online varies meaningfully by gender and can contribute to a measurable gender gap in the visibility of scientific ideas.

摘要

在科学界,自我推销现象普遍存在,但并非每个人的表现都相同。对其他领域自我推销的研究表明,部分由于对不符合性别规范的职业发展行为存在不良反应,女性自我推销的频率往往低于男性。我们通过分析350万名科学家撰写的280万篇研究论文的2300万条推文,来检验这种模式是否也适用于网络空间,研究时间跨度为六年。我们发现,总体而言,尽管考虑了重要的混杂因素,但女性在推特(现称X)上自我推销论文的可能性比男性低约28%。推特使用情况的差异并不能完全解释自我推销方面的性别差距,即使在性别相对平衡的研究领域,这种差距也很大,而在这些领域中,预期的不利因素较小。此外,我们发现,随着科研表现和学术地位的提高,性别差距会增大,对于来自顶尖机构、在高影响力期刊上发表论文的高产女性研究人员来说,这种差距最为明显。我们还发现了性别方面的不同回报:与不进行自我推销相比,自我推销与论文推文数量的增加有关,但女性的增加幅度略小于男性。我们的研究结果表明,网络学术自我推销在性别上存在显著差异,并可能导致科学观点可见性方面可衡量的性别差距。

相似文献

1
The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media.社交媒体上学术自我推广中的性别差距。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):5552. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60590-y.
2
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
3
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
6
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Trends and Cross-Country Differences in Authorship by Women in Academic Anaesthesiology Since 1996: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis.1996年以来学术麻醉学领域女性作者的全球趋势与跨国差异:重复横断面分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 21;14(16):5891. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165891.
2
Scientific publications that use promotional language in the abstract receive more citations and public attention.在摘要中使用宣传性语言的科学出版物会获得更多引用和公众关注。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Aug 5;3(1):118. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00293-8.
3
Social capital as a catalyst for gender inequality: A scoping review of networking disparities in academic medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Promotional Language in Grant Applications and Grant Success.科研基金申请中宣传性语言的使用与基金申请成功率
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2448696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48696.
2
Promotional language and the adoption of innovative ideas in science.宣传语言和科学创新思想的采用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 18;121(25):e2320066121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320066121. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
How scientists are making the most of Reddit.
Nature. 2024 Apr;628(8006):221-223. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00906-y.
社会资本作为性别不平等的催化剂:对学术医学领域网络差异的范围综述
Cancer. 2025 Jan 1;131(1):e35667. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35667. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
4
Empowering women facing gender-based violence amid COVID-19 through media campaigns.通过媒体宣传活动增强在 COVID-19 中面临性别暴力的妇女的权能。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Oct;7(10):1740-1752. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01665-y. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
5
Name-based demographic inference and the unequal distribution of misrecognition.基于姓名的人口统计推断与错误识别的不平等分布。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jul;7(7):1084-1095. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01587-9. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
6
Validated names for experimental studies on race and ethnicity.种族和民族实验研究的有效名称。
Sci Data. 2023 Mar 10;10(1):130. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-01947-0.
7
Is novel research worth doing? Evidence from peer review at 49 journals.新型研究是否值得开展?来自 49 种期刊同行评审的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 22;119(47):e2118046119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118046119. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
8
Untangling the network effects of productivity and prominence among scientists.解析科学家生产力和知名度的网络效应。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 20;13(1):4907. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32604-6.
9
The intersectional privilege of white able-bodied heterosexual men in STEM.理工科领域中白人、身体健全的异性恋男性的交叉性特权。
Sci Adv. 2022 Jun 17;8(24):eabo1558. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo1558. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
10
Effect of Altmetric score on manuscript citations: A randomized-controlled trial.影响 Altmetric 分数对论文引用的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Cephalalgia. 2022 Nov;42(13):1317-1322. doi: 10.1177/03331024221107385. Epub 2022 Jun 14.