• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟治疗载荷下应力对正畸系统组件的影响。

Stress influence on orthodontic system components under simulated treatment loadings.

作者信息

Benaissa Ali, Merdji Ali, Bendjaballah Mohamed Z, Ngan Peter, Mukdadi Osama M

机构信息

Laboratory LSTE, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Mascara, Mascara 29000, Algeria.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Mascara, Mascara 29000, Algeria.

出版信息

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Oct;195:105569. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105569. Epub 2020 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105569
PMID:32505974
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Mini-implants have been developed and effectively used by clinicians as anchorage for orthodontic tooth movement. The objective of this study was to elucidate the stress response of orthodontic forces on the periodontal system, bone tissues, mini-implant and the bracket-enamel interface.

METHODS

Computer tomography images of a commercially available mini-implant, an orthodontic bracket bonded to a central incisor, and jawbone section models were used to reconstruct three dimensional computer models. These models were exported and meshed in an ABAQUS finite-element package. Material properties, multi-segment interactions, boundary and loading conditions were then applied to each component. Finite-element analyses were conducted to elucidate the effect of orthodontic force on the equivalent von Mises stress response within the simulated orthodontic system.

RESULTS

The highest stress values in the orthodontic system were predicted at the mini-implant neck, at the interface of the cortical bone, and gradually decreased in the internal apical direction of the miniscrew. On the alveolar bone, the maximum stress values were located in the alveolar cortical bone near the cervical areas of the mini-implant, which is in line with clinical findings of area where bone loss was found post orthodontic tooth treatment. Another peak of von Mises stress response was found in the enamel bracket junction with a maximum up to 186.05 MPa. To ensure good bonding between the enamel and bracket, it is vital to select carefully the type and amount of bonding materials used in the bracket-enamel interface to assure an appropriate load distribution between the teeth and alveolar bone. The results also revealed the significance of the periodontal ligaments, acting as an intermediate cushion element, in the load transfer mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is sought to identify the stress response in a simulated orthodontic system to minimize the failure rate of mini-implants and bracket loss during orthodontic treatment.

摘要

背景与目的

微型种植体已被临床医生开发并有效地用作正畸牙齿移动的支抗。本研究的目的是阐明正畸力对牙周系统、骨组织、微型种植体和托槽 - 牙釉质界面的应力反应。

方法

使用市售微型种植体、粘结于中切牙的正畸托槽以及颌骨切片模型的计算机断层扫描图像来重建三维计算机模型。这些模型被导出并在ABAQUS有限元软件包中划分网格。然后将材料特性、多段相互作用、边界和加载条件应用于每个组件。进行有限元分析以阐明正畸力对模拟正畸系统内等效冯·米塞斯应力反应的影响。

结果

正畸系统中预测的最高应力值出现在微型种植体颈部、皮质骨界面处,并沿微型螺钉的根尖内部方向逐渐降低。在牙槽骨上,最大应力值位于微型种植体颈部区域附近的牙槽皮质骨中,这与正畸牙齿治疗后发现骨质流失区域的临床发现一致。在牙釉质 - 托槽连接处发现了另一个冯·米塞斯应力反应峰值,最大值高达186.05MPa。为确保牙釉质与托槽之间的良好粘结,在托槽 - 牙釉质界面仔细选择粘结材料的类型和用量以确保牙齿与牙槽骨之间适当的载荷分布至关重要。结果还揭示了牙周韧带作为中间缓冲元件在载荷传递机制中的重要性。

结论

本研究旨在确定模拟正畸系统中的应力反应,以尽量减少正畸治疗期间微型种植体的失败率和托槽脱落。

相似文献

1
Stress influence on orthodontic system components under simulated treatment loadings.模拟治疗载荷下应力对正畸系统组件的影响。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Oct;195:105569. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105569. Epub 2020 May 26.
2
Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.三维建模和有限元分析在正畸牙齿移动治疗计划中的应用。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jan;139(1):e59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.020.
3
Finite Element Analysis of Bone Stress for Miniscrew Implant Proximal to Root Under Occlusal Force and Implant Loading.咬合力量和种植体负载作用下牙根附近微螺钉种植体骨应力的有限元分析
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Oct;26(7):2072-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001969.
4
Effects of mechanical vibration on miniscrew implants and bone: Fem analysis.机械振动对微型螺钉种植体和骨组织的影响:有限元分析
Int Orthod. 2019 Mar;17(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.正畸微型种植体支抗有效整体内收设计的有限元分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):648-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.036.
6
Mechanical anisotropy of orthodontic mini-implants.正畸微型种植体的力学各向异性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Sep;38(9):972-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.05.009. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
7
Numerical analyses of biomechanical behavior of various orthodontic anchorage implants.各种正畸支抗种植体生物力学行为的数值分析。
J Orofac Orthop. 2009 Mar;70(2):115-27. doi: 10.1007/s00056-009-0817-y. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
8
Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.不同非刚性连接位置的牙支持和种植体支持固定义齿的生物力学评估:有限元分析。
J Prosthodont. 2011 Jan;20(1):16-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00654.x.
9
Maxillary posterior intrusion mechanics with mini-implant anchorage evaluated with the finite element method.采用有限元法评估微型种植体支抗的上颌后牙内收力学。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):e233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.019.
10
Two distalization methods compared in a novel patient-specific finite element analysis.两种远移方法在新型患者特异性有限元分析中的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Sep;156(3):326-336. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite element analysis of the impact of different traction anchorage locations on maxillary molar distalization with clear aligners and implant screws.不同牵引锚固位置对使用透明矫治器和种植支抗钉进行上颌磨牙远移影响的有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 14;25(1):1327. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06647-2.
2
Breaking Barriers in Orthodontics: An Experimental Study on How Stabilization Discs Improve Mini-Implant Outcomes.正畸领域的突破:关于稳定盘如何改善微型种植体效果的实验研究
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;13(3):109. doi: 10.3390/dj13030109.
3
Balancing the Load: How Optimal Forces Shape the Longevity and Stability of Orthodontic Mini-Implants.
平衡负荷:最佳力如何塑造正畸微型种植体的寿命和稳定性。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 5;13(2):71. doi: 10.3390/dj13020071.
4
Impacts of surface wear of attachments on maxillary canine distalization with clear aligners: a three-dimensional finite element study.附件表面磨损对使用透明矫治器远移上颌尖牙的影响:一项三维有限元研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 21;13:1530133. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1530133. eCollection 2025.
5
Using the appropriate modulus of elasticity of periodontal ligament matters in stress analysis of human first premolar tooth and periodontium structures.在人类第一前磨牙和牙周组织结构的应力分析中,使用合适的牙周膜弹性模量很重要。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):1549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85578-y.
6
The Hydrostatic Pressure Distribution in the Periodontal Ligament and the Risk of Root Resorption-A Finite Element Method (FEM) Study on the Nonlinear Innovative Model.牙周膜中的流体静压分布与牙根吸收风险——基于非线性创新模型的有限元法(FEM)研究
Materials (Basel). 2024 Apr 4;17(7):1661. doi: 10.3390/ma17071661.
7
Effective contribution ratio of the molar during sequential distalization using clear aligners and micro-implant anchorage: a finite element study.使用透明牙套和微种植体支抗进行序列远移时的摩尔有效贡献率:有限元研究。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Oct 9;24(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00485-0.
8
Effect of Splinting on Orthodontic Mini-Implant Tipping and Bone Histomorphometric Parameters: An In Vivo Animal Model Study.夹板固定对正畸微型种植体倾斜及骨组织形态计量学参数的影响:一项体内动物模型研究
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Apr 24;14(5):239. doi: 10.3390/jfb14050239.
9
Temporary anchorage devices and the forces and effects on the dentition and surrounding structures during orthodontic treatment: a scoping review.正畸治疗中临时支抗装置对牙齿和周围结构的作用力和影响:范围综述。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 May 31;45(3):324-337. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac072.
10
[Effects of different alveolar bone finite element models on the biomechanical responses of periodontal ligament].[不同牙槽骨有限元模型对牙周膜生物力学响应的影响]
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 25;38(2):295-302. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202007048.