• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者与医护人员通过反馈式教学进行的沟通、以患者为中心的糖尿病护理及糖尿病护理教育。

Patient-Provider communication with teach-back, patient-centered diabetes care, and diabetes care education.

作者信息

Hong Young-Rock, Jo Ara, Cardel Michelle, Huo Jinhai, Mainous Arch G

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2020 May 23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.029.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.029
PMID:32507589
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine how the teach-back, interactive communication loop between patient and provider, is utilized and its role in diabetes care delivery.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2011-2016. The study sample included US adults aged 18 or older with diabetes. Survey-design adjusted analyses were used to examine patterns of teach-back utilization across patient socioeconomic/clinical characteristics, patient-provider interactions, and diabetes care education.

RESULTS

Analysis of 2901 US adults with diabetes showed that 25.0 % reported patient teach-back experience during their visit to care. Compared with patients without teach-back, those with teach-back experience had higher scores on interaction quality with their providers (composite score: 90.8 vs. 55.8, P < .001). Those with teach-back were also more to receive additional advice on diet and exercise from providers (67.0 % vs. 60.9 %, P = 0.03) and to report that they were confident in diabetes self-care management (75.7 % vs. 70.3 %, P =0.03).

CONCLUSION

Teach-back communication appears to be effective in patient-provider interaction and diabetes care education, leading to higher confidence in self-care management.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Despite its potential, the utilization of teach-back communication is suboptimal. More effort is needed to promote effective use of teach-back communication in routine diabetes care.

摘要

目的

探讨患者与医疗服务提供者之间的“反馈教学”这一互动沟通循环是如何被运用的及其在糖尿病护理中的作用。

方法

这是一项对2011 - 2016年医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)的横断面分析。研究样本包括18岁及以上的美国成年糖尿病患者。采用调查设计调整分析来研究患者社会经济/临床特征、患者与医疗服务提供者的互动以及糖尿病护理教育中反馈教学的使用模式。

结果

对2901名美国成年糖尿病患者的分析表明,25.0%的患者报告在就诊时有过患者反馈教学经历。与没有反馈教学的患者相比,有反馈教学经历的患者与医疗服务提供者的互动质量得分更高(综合得分:90.8对55.8,P <.001)。有反馈教学的患者也更有可能从医疗服务提供者那里获得关于饮食和运动的额外建议(67.0%对60.9%,P = 0.03),并且报告他们对糖尿病自我护理管理有信心(75.7%对70.3%,P = 0.03)。

结论

反馈教学沟通在患者与医疗服务提供者的互动以及糖尿病护理教育中似乎是有效的,能使患者在自我护理管理方面更有信心。

实践意义

尽管反馈教学沟通有其潜力,但目前的使用情况并不理想。需要做出更多努力来促进在常规糖尿病护理中有效使用反馈教学沟通。

相似文献

1
Patient-Provider communication with teach-back, patient-centered diabetes care, and diabetes care education.患者与医护人员通过反馈式教学进行的沟通、以患者为中心的糖尿病护理及糖尿病护理教育。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 May 23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.029.
2
Pathways of Teach-Back Communication to Health Outcomes Among Individuals With Diabetes: A Pathway Modeling.基于路径模型的糖尿病患者健康结局之回馈教学沟通路径分析。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319211066658. doi: 10.1177/21501319211066658.
3
Association of Patient-Provider Teach-Back Communication with Diabetic Outcomes: A Cohort Study.患者-提供者反馈沟通与糖尿病结局的关联:一项队列研究。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Nov-Dec;33(6):903-912. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.200217.
4
Teach-Back Experience and Hospitalization Risk Among Patients with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions: a Matched Cohort Study.带教回馈体验与门诊医疗敏感状况患者住院风险:一项匹配队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):2176-2184. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05135-y. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
5
Improving Patient Health Literacy During Telehealth Visits Through Remote Teach-Back Methods Training for Family Medicine Residents: Pilot 2-Arm Cluster, Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.通过对家庭医学住院医师进行远程反馈方法培训,在远程医疗就诊期间提高患者健康素养:2组双臂整群、非随机对照试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 16;7:e51541. doi: 10.2196/51541.
6
Assessing Teach-Back Utilization in a Downtown Medical Center.评估市中心医疗中心的回授教学利用率。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Jul;5(3):e226-e232. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20210719-01. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
7
The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review.反馈教学法对慢性病患者健康教育中依从性和自我管理的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan;14(1):210-47. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296.
8
Relationship between Teach-back and patient-centered communication in primary care pediatric encounters.初级保健儿科就诊中回讲法与以患者为中心的沟通之间的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1345-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.022. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
9
Effects of discharge education using teach-back methods in patients with heart failure: A randomized controlled trial.采用回授法进行出院教育对心力衰竭患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Apr;140:104453. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104453. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
10
Characteristics of teach-back as practiced in a university health center, and its association with patient understanding, self-efficacy, and satisfaction.在大学健康中心实施的回授教学的特点,及其与患者理解、自我效能和满意度的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Nov;104(11):2700-2705. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.041. Epub 2021 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Teach back educational strategy on knowledge about breast cancer among low health literate women.针对健康素养较低的女性开展关于乳腺癌知识的“反馈式”教育策略。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1420. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06430-x.
2
Effect of Insulin Pen Training Using the Teach-Back Method on Diabetes Self-Management, Quality of Life, and HbA1c Levels in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Quasi-Experimental Study.采用反馈教学法进行胰岛素笔培训对老年2型糖尿病患者糖尿病自我管理、生活质量及糖化血红蛋白水平的影响:一项准实验研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;12(18):1854. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12181854.
3
Improving Patient Health Literacy During Telehealth Visits Through Remote Teach-Back Methods Training for Family Medicine Residents: Pilot 2-Arm Cluster, Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
通过对家庭医学住院医师进行远程反馈方法培训,在远程医疗就诊期间提高患者健康素养:2组双臂整群、非随机对照试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 16;7:e51541. doi: 10.2196/51541.
4
African American patient-provider communication about glaucoma vision quality-of-life.非裔美国青光眼患者与医疗服务提供者的沟通-视功能生活质量。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Feb;38(2):343-348. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02693-8. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
5
Testing proximal, intermediate, and health outcomes of patient centered communication among non-pregnant women of childbearing age with diabetes mellitus: Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2012-2018.对患有糖尿病的育龄非孕妇进行以患者为中心的沟通的近端、中间和健康结局测试:来自2012 - 2018年医疗支出面板调查的结果
PEC Innov. 2023 Jun 28;3:100185. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100185. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
6
Exercise Adherence and Compliance and Its Related Factors Among Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国老年2型糖尿病患者的运动依从性及其相关因素:一项横断面研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Dec 19;16:3329-3339. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S374120. eCollection 2022.
7
The perceived effects of COVID-19 while living with a chronic illness.感染新冠病毒(COVID-19)对慢性病患者生活的影响。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):154-162. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12835. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
8
Effects of teach-back health education (TBHE) based on WeChat mini-programs in preventing falls at home for urban older adults in China: a randomized controlled trial.基于微信小程序的回授式健康教育对我国城市老年人居家防跌倒效果的随机对照试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03297-9.
9
Pathways of Teach-Back Communication to Health Outcomes Among Individuals With Diabetes: A Pathway Modeling.基于路径模型的糖尿病患者健康结局之回馈教学沟通路径分析。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319211066658. doi: 10.1177/21501319211066658.
10
Promoting High-Quality Health Communication Between Young Adults With Diabetes and Health Care Providers.促进糖尿病青年与医疗服务提供者之间的高质量健康沟通。
Diabetes Spectr. 2021 Nov;34(4):345-356. doi: 10.2337/dsi21-0036. Epub 2021 Nov 10.