Handelzalts Shirley, Gray Ganit, Steinberg-Henn Flavia, Soroker Nachum, Melzer Itshak
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital, Ra'anana, Israel.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;46(4):491-500. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203039.
Persons with stroke (PwS) demonstrate impaired reactive balance control placing them at increased risk of falls. Yet, tests used in clinical practice to assess this risk usually rely on proactive balance control.
To investigate differences in proactive balance in PwS with varying reactive balance capacity.
Reactive balance control was assessed in 48 first-event subacute PwS by measuring multiple-step threshold and fall threshold in response to unannounced surface perturbations. They were classified as low-, medium- high- threshold fallers and non-fallers in accordance with the perturbation magnitude at which they were unable to maintain balance (fall threshold). Proactive balance control and gait performance were tested using the Berg Balance test, 10-meter walk test, 6-minute walk test and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC).
PwS who demonstrated poor reactive balance capacity were also more impaired in their proactive balance and gait. Proactive balance and gait performance were significantly different between the 4 groups while ABC was not. The associations between reactive and proactive measures of balance were moderate (r = 0.53-0.67).
The moderate correlations between reactive and proactive balance control suggest the recruitment of different neural mechanisms for these two operations, highlighting the importance of assessing and treating reactive balance in clinics.
中风患者(PwS)表现出反应性平衡控制受损,这使他们跌倒的风险增加。然而,临床实践中用于评估这种风险的测试通常依赖于主动性平衡控制。
研究反应性平衡能力不同的中风患者在主动性平衡方面的差异。
通过测量48例首次发病的亚急性中风患者对突然出现的表面扰动做出反应时的多步阈值和跌倒阈值,来评估其反应性平衡控制。根据他们无法保持平衡时的扰动幅度(跌倒阈值),将他们分为低阈值跌倒者、中阈值跌倒者、高阈值跌倒者和非跌倒者。使用伯格平衡测试、10米步行测试、6分钟步行测试和特定活动平衡信心量表(ABC)来测试主动性平衡控制和步态表现。
反应性平衡能力差的中风患者在主动性平衡和步态方面也受损更严重。4组之间的主动性平衡和步态表现存在显著差异,而ABC量表没有差异。反应性和主动性平衡测量之间的关联为中等程度(r = 0.53 - 0.67)。
反应性和主动性平衡控制之间的中等相关性表明这两种操作涉及不同的神经机制,突出了在临床中评估和治疗反应性平衡的重要性。