Garrido Talissa-Mayer, Hoshino Lidiane-Vizioli-de Castro, Hirata Ronaldo, Sato Francielle, Neto Antonio-Medina, Guidini Victor-Hugo-Fazoli, Terada Raquel-Sano-Suga
MS, DDS, Private practice, Maringa, Brasil.
PhD Student, MS, Department of Physics, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brasil.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 May 1;12(5):e461-e467. doi: 10.4317/jced.56535. eCollection 2020 May.
Some composite resins contain luminophorous agents in order to reproduce tooth fluorescence. The objective of this study was to compare the fluorescence spectra emitted by composite resins with those of human enamel and dentin, and their emission behaviour after a 90-day natural aging period.
Nine shades of the composite resins Z350XT/3M (XT), Opallis/FGM (OP) and Empress Direct/Ivoclar-Vivadent (ED) were analyzed. Five specimens (10.0 mm x 2.0mm) were fabricated for each shade. Enamel (5.0 mm x 0.30 mm) and dentin (5.0 mm x 1.0 mm) specimens were obtained from sound human third molars. Fluorescence spectra of human dentin and enamel as well as the composite specimens immediately after fabrication were measured at the excitation peaks of 375, 395 and 410 nm. To assess composite resin fluorescence intensity changes over time, measurements were conducted after 30, 60 and 90 days, at 395 nm. Differences in fluorescence intensity over time were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's test (<0.05).
Fluorescence spectra baseline values of composites demonstrated no differences in intensity among the excitation peaks tested, with maximum emission found at the peak of 450 nm. Enamel and dentin spectra varied with different excitations, and the greater the excitation, the longer the wavelength in comparison to composite resins. After 90 days, XT presented an increase in fluorescence intensity, while OP and ED showed a reduction when compared with baseline values.
Fluorescence intensity of composite resins changed during the period analyzed, with an emission behavior different from that of human enamel and dentin. The main changes occurred in the first 30 days. Composite resins, dental materials, fluorescence, fluorescence spectrometry.
一些复合树脂含有发光剂以再现牙齿荧光。本研究的目的是比较复合树脂发出的荧光光谱与人类牙釉质和牙本质的荧光光谱,以及它们在90天自然老化期后的发射行为。
分析了复合树脂Z350XT/3M(XT)、Opallis/FGM(OP)和Empress Direct/Ivoclar-Vivadent(ED)的九种色度。每种色度制作五个样本(10.0毫米×2.0毫米)。从健康的人类第三磨牙获取牙釉质(5.0毫米×0.30毫米)和牙本质(5.0毫米×1.0毫米)样本。在375、395和410纳米的激发峰处测量人类牙本质和牙釉质以及刚制作完成的复合样本的荧光光谱。为评估复合树脂荧光强度随时间的变化,在30、60和90天后于395纳米处进行测量。使用方差分析和Tukey检验(<0.05)分析荧光强度随时间的差异。
复合树脂的荧光光谱基线值在测试的激发峰之间强度无差异,最大发射出现在450纳米的峰值处。牙釉质和牙本质光谱随不同激发而变化,与复合树脂相比,激发越大,波长越长。90天后,与基线值相比,XT的荧光强度增加,而OP和ED则降低。
在分析期间复合树脂的荧光强度发生了变化,其发射行为与人类牙釉质和牙本质不同。主要变化发生在最初的30天。复合树脂、牙科材料、荧光、荧光光谱法。