Moon Hye-Jin, Chung Chun Kee, Lee Sang Kun
Department of Neurology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Epilepsy Res. 2019 Dec 31;9(2):111-118. doi: 10.14581/jer.19013. eCollection 2019 Dec.
We attempted to evaluate the surgical prognostic value of various types of aura in conjunction with the results of other presurgical evaluations in patients with an intracranial ictal onset zone confirmed by invasive studies and focal resection. We also attempted to determine how often the habitual auras could be elicited and to demonstrate the prognostic value of these stimulation-induced auras (SIAs).
We reviewed retrospectively the records of patients who had undergone intracranial electroencephalography evaluation and focal resective surgery for intractable partial epilepsy between 1995 and 2009. We identified the localizing value and prognostic value of the patients' auras. We correlated the resection of the area with SIA and surgical outcome.
Aura was reported in 225 out of 300 patients. Patients with medial temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) or occipital lobe epilepsy had a higher chance of having aura. The presence of aura, medial TLE, hippocampal sclerosis on pathology, focal lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ipsilateral abnormality on fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography were significantly correlated with seizure-free outcome. The presence of auditory aura, parietal lobe epilepsy, multifocal epilepsy, and dual pathology was associated with poor outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that auditory aura, multifocal epilepsy, hippocampal sclerosis, and lesion on MRI were prognostic factors for intractable partial epilepsy. SIA was observed in 29 out of the 134 patients who had habitual aura on history. The degree of complete resection of the area with SIA was not related to seizure-free outcome.
The presence of aura favors good surgical outcome and certain types of aura, such as auditory aura, have poor prognostic value. SIA, which was encountered in 21.6% of patients, was not related to seizure-free outcome.
我们试图结合侵入性研究和局灶性切除所证实的颅内发作起始区患者的其他术前评估结果,评估各类先兆的手术预后价值。我们还试图确定习惯性先兆能够被诱发的频率,并阐明这些刺激诱发先兆(SIA)的预后价值。
我们回顾性分析了1995年至2009年间接受颅内脑电图评估和局灶性切除手术治疗难治性部分性癫痫患者的病历。我们确定了患者先兆的定位价值和预后价值。我们将该区域的切除与SIA及手术结果进行关联分析。
300例患者中有225例报告有先兆。内侧颞叶癫痫(TLE)或枕叶癫痫患者出现先兆的几率更高。先兆的存在、内侧TLE、病理检查发现海马硬化、磁共振成像(MRI)上的局灶性病变以及氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描上的同侧异常与无癫痫发作结局显著相关。听觉先兆的存在、顶叶癫痫、多灶性癫痫和双重病理与不良结局相关。多变量分析显示,听觉先兆、多灶性癫痫、海马硬化和MRI上的病变是难治性部分性癫痫的预后因素。在有习惯性先兆病史的1�4例患者中,有29例观察到SIA。SIA区域的完全切除程度与无癫痫发作结局无关。
先兆的存在有利于良好的手术结局,而某些类型的先兆,如听觉先兆,预后价值较差。21.6%的患者出现了SIA,其与无癫痫发作结局无关。