Baart Victor M, van Duijn Chayenne, van Egmond Sylvia L, Dijckmeester Willem A, Jansen Jeroen C, Vahrmeijer Alexander L, Sier Cornelis F M, Cohen Danielle
Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 5;12(6):1474. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061474.
R0 resection is paramount in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, in the setting of recurrence, immunocompromised patients, or non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with a spindle growth pattern, tumor borders are difficult, if not impossible, to determine. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) aids in this differentiation. Potential targets for FGS of CSCC and HNSCC were evaluated. Most sections stained intensely for αvβ6 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on tumor cells. Normal epithelium stained less for αvβ6 than for EGFR. In addition, soft tissue and stroma stained negative for both, allowing for clear discrimination of the soft tissue margin. Tumor cells weakly expressed urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) while expression on stromal cells was moderate. Normal epithelium rarely expressed uPAR, resulting in clear discrimination of superficial margins. Tumors did not consistently express integrin β3, carcinoembryonic antigen, epithelial cell adhesion molecule, or vascular endothelial growth factor A. In conclusion, αvβ6 and EGFR allowed for precise discrimination of SSC at the surgically problematic soft tissue margins. Superficial margins are ideally distinguished with uPAR. In the future, FGS in the surgically challenging setting of cutaneous and mucosal SCC could benefit from a tailor-made approach, with EGFR and αvβ6 as targets.
R0切除在皮肤鳞状细胞癌(CSCC)和头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)中至关重要。然而,在复发、免疫功能低下的患者或具有梭形生长模式的非角化鳞状细胞癌(SCC)情况下,肿瘤边界即便不是不可能确定,也是很难确定的。荧光引导手术(FGS)有助于这种区分。对CSCC和HNSCC的FGS潜在靶点进行了评估。大多数切片中肿瘤细胞上的αvβ6和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)染色强烈。正常上皮细胞αvβ6染色比EGFR少。此外,软组织和基质两者染色均为阴性,从而能够清晰区分软组织边缘。肿瘤细胞弱表达尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(uPAR),而基质细胞上的表达为中等。正常上皮细胞很少表达uPAR,从而能够清晰区分浅表边缘。肿瘤并非始终表达整合素β3、癌胚抗原、上皮细胞黏附分子或血管内皮生长因子A。总之,αvβ6和EGFR能够在手术困难的软组织边缘精确区分SSC。uPAR最适合区分浅表边缘。未来,在皮肤和黏膜SCC手术具有挑战性的情况下,以EGFR和αvβ6为靶点的量身定制方法可能会使FGS受益。