Behbahani Mandana, Khalid Syed I, Lam Sandi K, Caceres Adrian
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 Dec;36(12):2949-2960. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04699-z. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS) is commonly performed by pediatric neurosurgeons and there is no consensus in management of VPS infection as it relates to diagnosis and treatment.
We utilized an international practitioner-based survey to study the variability in VPS infection diagnostic and therapeutic measures.
A survey gauging practice patterns of pediatric neurosurgeons regarding VPS and its complication management was distributed. Survey endpoints were analyzed by VPS case volume and pediatric-focused case volume regarding diagnostic measures, use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile, microbiology, and treatment.
A total of 439 surveys were distributed, with a response rate of 31%. Responders ranged from Americas (44.9%), European (31.4%), Asian (18.6%), African (2.5%), to Australian continents (2.5%). Practitioners were stratified based on number and percentage pediatric VPS performed. Institutions performing highest VPS and percentage pediatric case volumes had lower rate of VPS infection. Shunt tap was the most widely used diagnostic study. Overall CSF profile did not affect decision making towards VPS internalization, except for leukocyte count ≤ 20 × 10/L. Practitioners utilized 3 negative cultures prior to VPS internalization. Discrepancies in surgical management were noted amongst centers with high versus low VPS volume and proportion of pediatric-focused case volume. Practice patterns were not noted to be organism dependent. Antibiotic-impregnated shunts were utilized in the Americas and Europe over other regions but only in one third of all initial VPS or as a preventive strategy after a VPS infection has been resolved respectively.
Survey results from 6 continents in VPS management revealed patterns of lower infection in high-volume centers, 3 negative cultures prior to internalization and aggressive surgical VPS infection management in high-volume institutions.
脑室腹腔分流术(VPS)通常由儿科神经外科医生实施,而在VPS感染的管理方面,包括诊断和治疗,尚未达成共识。
我们通过一项基于国际从业者的调查,研究VPS感染诊断和治疗措施的差异。
分发了一项关于儿科神经外科医生对VPS及其并发症管理的实践模式的调查。根据VPS病例数量和儿科相关病例数量,对调查终点进行分析,涉及诊断措施、脑脊液(CSF)检查结果、微生物学和治疗。
共分发了439份调查问卷,回复率为31%。回复者来自美洲(44.9%)、欧洲(31.4%)、亚洲(18.6%)、非洲(2.5%)和澳大利亚大陆(2.5%)。从业者根据实施的儿科VPS数量和百分比进行分层。实施VPS数量最多且儿科病例百分比最高的机构,VPS感染率较低。分流穿刺是最广泛使用的诊断研究。总体CSF检查结果除白细胞计数≤20×10/L外,不影响VPS植入的决策。从业者在VPS植入前采用3次阴性培养。在VPS病例数量多与少以及儿科相关病例数量比例不同的中心之间,手术管理存在差异。未发现实践模式因感染病原体而异。美洲和欧洲比其他地区更多地使用抗生素涂层分流管,但仅分别用于所有初始VPS的三分之一或作为VPS感染解决后的预防策略。
来自六大洲的VPS管理调查结果显示,高容量中心的感染率较低,植入前进行3次阴性培养,以及高容量机构对VPS感染进行积极的手术管理。