Outcomes Comparison Between Wavefront-Optimized and Topography-Guided PRK in Contralateral Eyes With Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes between topography-guided customized ablation treatment (TCAT) and wavefront-optimized (WFO) photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in fellow eyes of myopic patients.

METHODS

Forty-six eyes of 23 patients who underwent PRK were included. WFO ablation was performed in one eye (WFO group) and TCAT in the fellow eye (TCAT group). The customized treatment plan was based on the Topolyzer Vario topography system (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) data. The patients were observed for 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

One year after the surgery, there was no significant difference in the manifest refraction spherical equivalent, sphere, or cylinder variables between the two groups (P > .05). In both groups, 96% of eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better at 12 months postoperatively. Accuracy, safety, and efficacy of the refractive and visual outcomes were similar in the two groups. The postoperative higher order aberrations magnitude was lower in the TCAT group, but this was not statistically significant (P > .05). During the 12-month follow-up, no patient described any symptoms related to glare, halos, or starbursts in either eye. Other postoperative complications, such as infection or cor-neal infiltrates, did not occur in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

TCAT and WFO ablations provided similar outcomes after PRK for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative corneal wavefront analysis. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(6):358-365.].