Suppr超能文献

评估与遗传性心律失常和遗传性心肌病基因中不确定意义变异结果相关的临床实践。

Evaluation of Clinical Practices Related to Variants of Uncertain Significance Results in Inherited Cardiac Arrhythmia and Inherited Cardiomyopathy Genes.

机构信息

College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (R.D.M.), University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

College of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences (T.M.), University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

出版信息

Circ Genom Precis Med. 2020 Aug;13(4):e002789. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002789. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing use of genetic tests have identified many variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in genes associated with inherited arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies. Evaluation of clinical practices, including medical management recommendations for VUS patients and their families, is important to prevent over- or under-treatment that may result in morbidity or mortality. The purpose of this study is to describe practices related to VUS results including information and medical management recommendations providers give patients and their families.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey was distributed to genetic counselors (GCs) and cardiologists who have seen at least one patient for inherited arrhythmias or cardiomyopathies. The survey explored providers' confidence in counseling, explanation of VUSs, topics covered before and after genetic testing, and clinical recommendations using a hypothetical scenario maximizing uncertainty with an unclear clinical and molecular diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and median confidence and likelihood of making various medical recommendations were compared across provider type.

RESULTS

Providers (N=102) who completed the survey included 29 cardiovascular GCs, 50 GCs from other specialties, and 23 cardiologists. GCs feel more confident than cardiologists counseling about VUS results (<0.001); while both cardiovascular GCs and cardiologists feel more confident than other GCs in providing input regarding medical management recommendations (=0.001 and =0.01, respectively). Cardiologists were more likely than cardiac GCs to recommend clinical testing for family members even though testing in the scenario is expected to be uninformative.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings illustrate how the expertise of different providers may impact decision processes, suggesting the need for interdisciplinary clinics to optimize care for challenging cases.

摘要

背景

越来越多的基因检测发现了与遗传性心律失常和心肌病相关基因中的许多意义不明的变异(VUS)。评估临床实践,包括 VUS 患者及其家属的医疗管理建议,对于预防过度或不足治疗至关重要,因为这可能导致发病率或死亡率增加。本研究的目的是描述与 VUS 结果相关的实践,包括提供者向患者及其家属提供的信息和医疗管理建议。

方法

向至少见过一名遗传性心律失常或心肌病患者的遗传咨询师(GC)和心脏病专家分发了匿名在线调查。该调查探讨了提供者在咨询、解释 VUS、基因检测前后涵盖的主题以及使用最大程度增加不确定性的假设情况进行临床推荐方面的信心。计算了描述性统计数据,并比较了不同类型提供者对各种医疗建议的信心和可能性。

结果

完成调查的提供者(N=102)包括 29 名心血管 GC、50 名来自其他专业的 GC 和 23 名心脏病专家。GC 在 VUS 结果咨询方面比心脏病专家更有信心(<0.001);心血管 GC 和心脏病专家在提供医疗管理建议方面比其他 GC 更有信心(分别为=0.001 和=0.01)。尽管在该情景下检测预计无信息,但心脏病专家比心脏 GC 更有可能建议对家庭成员进行临床检测。

结论

这些发现说明了不同提供者的专业知识如何影响决策过程,表明需要跨学科诊所来优化对具有挑战性病例的护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验