Dubberke Erik R, Gerding Dale N, Kelly Ciarán P, Garey Kevin W, Rahav Galia, Mosley Audrey, Tipping Robert, Dorr Mary Beth
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 2;7(6):ofaa157. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa157. eCollection 2020 Jun.
In phase 3 MODIFY I/II trials, bezlotoxumab significantly reduced recurrence of () infection (rCDI) over 12 weeks. Choice of CDI antibacterial treatment may affect CDI-related outcomes; therefore, this prespecified analysis assessed if the magnitude of bezlotoxumab-induced rCDI reduction was influenced by the antibiotic administered.
In MODIFY I/II (NCT01241552/NCT01513239), participants received a single infusion of bezlotoxumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo during anti-CDI treatment. Using pooled data from MODIFY I/II, initial clinical cure (ICC) and rCDI were assessed in metronidazole-, vancomycin-, and fidaxomicin-treated subgroups.
Of 1554 participants in MODIFY I/II, 753 (48.5%) received metronidazole, 745 (47.9%) vancomycin, and 56 (3.6%) fidaxomicin. Fewer participants receiving metronidazole had a prior CDI episode in the previous 6 months (12.9%) or ≥1 risk factor for rCDI (66.0%) vs participants receiving vancomycin (41.2% and 83.6%, respectively) and fidaxomicin (55.4% and 89.3%, respectively). ICC rates were similar in the bezlotoxumab (metronidazole, 81.0%; vancomycin, 78.5%; fidaxomicin, 86.7%) and placebo groups (metronidazole, 81.3%; vancomycin, 79.6%; fidaxomicin, 76.9%). In placebo-treated participants, the rCDI was lower in the metronidazole subgroup vs the vancomycin and fidaxomicin subgroups (metronidazole, 28.0%; vancomycin, 38.4%; fidaxomicin, 35.0%). When analyzed by subsets based on history of CDI, rCDI rates were similar in the metronidazole and vancomycin groups. rCDI rates were lower in all antibiotic subgroups for bezlotoxumab vs placebo (metronidazole: rate difference [RD], -9.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.4% to -3.1%; vancomycin: RD, -15.4%; 95% CI, -22.7% to -8.0%; fidaxomicin: RD, -11.9%; 95% CI, -38.1% to 14.3%).
Bezlotoxumab reduces rCDI vs placebo in participants receiving metronidazole and vancomycin, with a similar effect size in participants receiving fidaxomicin.
在3期MODIFY I/II试验中,贝佐妥单抗在12周内显著降低了艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)的复发率。艰难梭菌感染抗菌治疗的选择可能会影响与艰难梭菌感染相关的结果;因此,这项预先设定的分析评估了贝佐妥单抗诱导的rCDI降低幅度是否受所使用抗生素的影响。
在MODIFY I/II(NCT01241552/NCT01513239)试验中,参与者在抗艰难梭菌感染治疗期间接受单次输注贝佐妥单抗(10mg/kg)或安慰剂。利用MODIFY I/II试验的汇总数据,在接受甲硝唑、万古霉素和非达霉素治疗的亚组中评估初始临床治愈(ICC)和rCDI情况。
在MODIFY I/II试验的1554名参与者中,753名(48.5%)接受了甲硝唑治疗,745名(47.9%)接受了万古霉素治疗,56名(3.6%)接受了非达霉素治疗。与接受万古霉素(分别为41.2%和83.6%)和非达霉素(分别为55.4%和89.3%)治疗的参与者相比,接受甲硝唑治疗的参与者在过去6个月内有既往艰难梭菌感染发作的比例(12.9%)或rCDI的≥1个风险因素的比例(66.0%)更低。贝佐妥单抗组(甲硝唑组为81.0%;万古霉素组为78.5%;非达霉素组为86.7%)和安慰剂组(甲硝唑组为81.3%;万古霉素组为79.6%;非达霉素组为76.9%)的ICC率相似。在接受安慰剂治疗的参与者中,甲硝唑亚组的rCDI低于万古霉素亚组和非达霉素亚组(甲硝唑组为28.0%;万古霉素组为38.4%;非达霉素组为35.0%)。按艰难梭菌感染病史的亚组分析时,甲硝唑组和万古霉素组的rCDI率相似。与安慰剂相比,贝佐妥单抗在所有抗生素亚组中的rCDI率均较低(甲硝唑组:率差[RD],-9.7%;95%置信区间[CI],-16.4%至-3.1%;万古霉素组:RD,-15.4%;95%CI,-22.7%至-8.0%;非达霉素组:RD,-11.9%;95%CI,-38.1%至14.3%)。
与安慰剂相比,贝佐妥单抗可降低接受甲硝唑和万古霉素治疗的参与者的rCDI,在接受非达霉素治疗的参与者中效果大小相似。